| Literature DB >> 27020759 |
Ruti Sella1, Orly Gal-Or2, Eitan Livny3, Mor Dachbash4, Yael Nisgav5, Dov Weinberger6, Tami Livnat7, Irit Bahar8.
Abstract
The aim of this experimental study was to compare the efficacy of topical aflibercept and topical bevacizumab in preventing corneal neovascularization. A chemical burn was created in the right central cornea of male Sprague-Dawley rats, followed immediately by instillation of one drop (25 mg/ml, 20 μl volume) of aflibercept (15 eyes), bevacizumab (14 eyes), or saline (15 eyes). Treatment was repeated twice daily for 7 days. Corneal neovascularization was determined using corneal photographs (ImageJ) on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and histological and immunofluorescence studies, on day 10. Stromal immunoreactivity was evaluated 2 days after injury in 6 rats treated singly with bevacizumab or aflibercept. Corneal neovascularization was observed clinically on day 4 in all groups. In the aflibercept group, the area of neovascularization increased from 7.38 ± 2.23% on day 4 to 21.73 ± 14.59% on day 7 and 31.0 ± 23.61% on day 10. Corresponding values in the bevacizumab group were 6.04% ± 1.81%, 51.27 ± 15.50%, and 54.4 ± 11.33%, and in the control group, 8.99 ± 1.93%, 42.6 ± 19.59%, and 55.15 ± 11.54%. The area of neovascularization was significantly smaller on days 7 and 10 in the aflibercept group than in the control and bevacizumab groups (P < 0.001, all analyses), with no significant differences between the latter two groups (day 7, P = 0.868; day 10, P = 0.213). Clinical findings were compatible with the histological data and supported by immunofluorescence and corneal flat-mount staining. Both drugs demonstrated variable penetration into the corneal stroma. Topical aflibercept effectively inhibits corneal neovascularization in a rat model of chemical burn. These findings may have important therapeutic implications for humans.Entities:
Keywords: Aflibercept; Bevacizumab; Chemical burn; Corneal neovascularization; Topical treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27020759 DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.03.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Eye Res ISSN: 0014-4835 Impact factor: 3.467