| Literature DB >> 27020682 |
Fergus Noble1,2, Toby Mellows3, Leo H McCormick Matthews3, Adrian C Bateman4, Scott Harris5, Timothy J Underwood3,6, James P Byrne6, Ian S Bailey6, Donna M Sharland6, Jamie J Kelly6, John N Primrose3,6, Surinder S Sahota3, Andrew R Bateman3,7, Gareth J Thomas3,4, Christian H Ottensmeier3,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is increasingly common in the west, and survival remains poor at 10-15 % at 5 years. Immune responses are increasingly implicated as a determining factor of tumour progression. The ability of lymphocytes to recognise tumour antigens provides a mechanism for a host immune attack against cancer providing a potential treatment strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte; Immune response; Immunotherapy; Oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Regulatory T cells; Tumour regression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27020682 PMCID: PMC4880639 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-016-1826-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.968
Clinicopathological characteristics of patient cohort for which formed TMAs
|
| |
|---|---|
| Operation age* | 67.77 (45.48–85.41) |
| Sex ratio (M:F) | 112:16 |
| ASA | |
| 1 | 13 (10.2) |
| 2 | 93 (72.4) |
| 3 | 22 (17.3) |
| Tumour site | |
| Lower 1/3 | 46 (35.9) |
| OGJ—S1 | 25 (19.5) |
| OGJ—S2 | 26 (20.3) |
| OGJ—S3 | 31 (24.2) |
| Type | |
| AC | 128 (100) |
| pT or ypT | |
| T1 | 29 (22.7) |
| T2 | 30 (23.4) |
| T3 | 65 (50.8) |
| T4 | 4 (3.1) |
| pN or ypN | |
| N0 | 59 (46.1) |
| N1 | 28 (21.9) |
| N2 | 21 (16.4) |
| N3 | 20 (15.6) |
| pM or ypM | |
| M0 | 125 (97.7) |
| M1 | 3 (2.3) |
| Resection clearance (R0) | 104 (81.3) |
| Vascular invasion | 51 (39.8) |
| Lymphatic invasion | 21 (16.4) |
| Perineural invasion | 17 (13.3) |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | 76 (59.4) |
| Neoadjuvant regime | |
| ECX | 64 (50) |
| EOX | 10 (7.8) |
| ECF | 2 (1.6) |
| Tumour regression grade | |
| 1 | 0 (0) |
| 2 | 11 (8.6) |
| 3 | 10 (7.8) |
| 4 | 29 (22.7) |
| 5 | 26 (20.3) |
| Not assessed | 0 (0) |
| Surgery only | 52 (40.6) |
| Nodal downstaging | 30/76 (39.5) |
Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated
ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system
* Values in parentheses are range
Fig. 1Frequency distribution of CD8+ TILs by treatment modality highlighting the low proportion of patients with high TIL infiltration
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with OAC-specific survival
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95 % CI |
| HR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Patient factors | ||||||
| Age | 0.987 | 0.961–1.014 | 0.348 | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 1 | Ref | ||||
| Male | 1.088 | 0.495–2.389 | 0.834 | |||
| ASA | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | Ref | ||||
| 2 | 1.670 | 0.659–4.231 | 0.280 | |||
| 3 | 1.398 | 0.485–4.031 | 0.535 | |||
| Performance status | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | Ref | ||||
| 1 | 0.867 | 0.475–1.580 | 0.640 | |||
| 2 | 0.606 | 0.199–1.843 | 0.377 | |||
| Preoperative smoker | ||||||
| No | 1 | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 0.835 | 0.491–1.421 | 0.507 | |||
| Neoadjuvant Rx | ||||||
| No | 1 | Ref | 1 | Ref | ||
| Yes | 1.723 | 1.011–2.937 |
| 1.703 | 0.977–2.971 | 0.061 |
| Immunohistochemistry | ||||||
| CD3 | 0.966 | 0.947–0.985 |
| 1.035 | 0.997–1.075 | 0.075 |
| CD4 | 0.927 | 0.874–0.982 |
| |||
| CD8 | 0.895 | 0.849–0.944 |
| 0.847 | 0.760–0.944 |
|
| FOXp3+ | 0.879 | 0.801–0.966 |
| |||
| Tumour factors | ||||||
| ypT or pT stage | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | Ref | ||||
| 2 | 2.450 | 0.947–6.338 | 0.065 | |||
| 3 | 4.480 | 1.872–10.720 |
| |||
| 4 | 16.094 | 4.385–59.071 |
| |||
| ypN or pN stage | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | Ref | 1 | Ref | ||
| 1 | 4.036 | 2.033–8.014 |
| 3.745 | 1.806–7.764 |
|
| 2 | 6.063 | 2.889–12.723 |
| 3.476 | 1.515–7.974 |
|
| 3 | 5.143 | 2.464–10.735 |
| 3.607 | 1.635–7.959 |
|
| ypM or pM stage | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | Ref | ||||
| 1 | 4.546 | 1.402–14.746 |
| |||
| Vascular invasion | ||||||
| No | 1 | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 2.234 | 1.354–3.684 |
| |||
| Lymphatic invasion | ||||||
| No | 1 | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 1.985 | 1.109–3.554 |
| |||
| Perineural invasion | ||||||
| No | 1 | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 2.811 | 1.519–5.201 |
| |||
| Resection clearance | ||||||
| R0 | 1 | Ref | 1 | Ref | ||
| R1 | 3.027 | 1.737–5.273 |
| 3.134 | 1.699–5.783 |
|
Bold values indicate variables of significance
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves of cancer-associated survival revealing prognostic significance of TILs in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Clinical and pathological factors in OAC patients that received chemotherapy (n = 76) based on their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LN downstaged)
| Responder | Non-responder |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age* | 63.68 (45.48–77.75) | 62.62 (50.67–81.28) | 0.941 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 29 (96.7) | 39 (84.8) | 0.101 |
| Female | 1 (3.3) | 7 (15.2) | |
| Performance status | |||
| 0 | 8 (26.7) | 14 (30.4) | 0.446 |
| 1 | 20 (66.7) | 32 (69.6) | |
| 2 | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) | |
| ASA | |||
| 1 | 5 (16.7) | 5 (11.1) | 0.859 |
| 2 | 20 (66.7) | 37 (80.0) | |
| 3 | 5 (16.7) | 4 (8.9) | |
| ypT | |||
| 1 | 11 (36.7) | 2 (4.3) |
|
| 2 | 10 (33.3) | 11 (23.9) | |
| 3 | 9 (30.0) | 31 (67.4 | |
| 4 | 0 (0) | 2 (4.3) | |
| ypN | |||
| 0 | 30 (100) | 3 (6.5) |
|
| 1 | 0 (0) | 15 (32.6) | |
| 2 | 0 (0) | 15 (32.6) | |
| 3 | 0 (0) | 13 (28.3) | |
| Tumour response | |||
| Yes (TRG2) | 11 (36.7) | 0 (0) |
|
| No (TRG 3–5) | 19 (63.3) | 46 (100) | |
| Differentiation | |||
| G1—well | 5 (16.7) | 37 (80.4) |
|
| G2—Moderate | 9 (30.0) | 1 (2.2) | |
| G3—poor | 16 (53.3) | 11 (23.9) | |
| Resection clearance | |||
| R0 | 2 (6.7) | 12 (26.1) |
|
| R1 | 28 (93.3) | 34 (73.9) | |
| Immunohistochemistry values* | |||
| CD3 | 15.15 (0.00–44.30) | 11.20 (0.00–64.00) |
|
| CD4 | 5.00 (0.00–27.00) | 2.30 (0.00–20.00) |
|
| CD8 | 8.65 (0.00–20.70) | 4.50 (0.00–18.70) |
|
| FOXp3+ | 1.85 (0.00–11.30) | 1.00 (0.00–9.30) |
|
Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated
* Values in parentheses are range
Bold values indicate variables of significance
Univariate and multivariate analysis of immunohistochemical markers for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LN downstaged) in OAC
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95 % CI |
| HR | 95 % CI |
| |
| CD3 | 0.957 | 0.924–0.992 |
| |||
| CD4 | 0.916 | 0.838–1.001 | 0.052 | |||
| CD8 | 0.869 | 0.789–0.958 |
| 0.869 | 0.789–0.958 |
|
| FOXp3+ | 0.868 | 0.734–1.026 | 0.097 | |||
Bold values indicate variables of significance