Literature DB >> 27020352

TESTING THE EFFECTS OF ELEVATED PCO2 ON COCCOLITHOPHORES (PRYMNESIOPHYCEAE): COMPARISON BETWEEN HAPLOID AND DIPLOID LIFE STAGES(1).

Sarah Fiorini1, Jack J Middelburg1, Jean-Pierre Gattuso1.   

Abstract

The response of Emiliania huxleyi (Lohmann) W. W. Hay et H. Mohler, Calcidiscus leptoporus (G. Murray et V. H. Blackman) J. Schiller, and Syracosphaera pulchra Lohmann to elevated partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2 ) was investigated in batch cultures. We reported on the response of both haploid and diploid life stages of these three species. Growth rate, cell size, particulate inorganic carbon (PIC), and particulate organic carbon (POC) of both life stages were measured at two different pCO2 (400 and 760 parts per million [ppm]), and their organic and inorganic carbon production were calculated. The two life stages within the same species generally exhibited a similar response to elevated pCO2 , the response of the haploid stage being often more pronounced than that of the diploid stage. The growth rate was consistently higher at elevated pCO2 , but the response of other processes varied among species. Calcification rate of C. leptoporus and of S. pulchra did not change at elevated pCO2 , whereas it increased in E. huxleyi. POC production and cell size of both life stages of S. pulchra and of the haploid stage of E. huxleyi markedly decreased at elevated pCO2 . It remained unaltered in the diploid stage of E. huxleyi and C. leptoporus and increased in the haploid stage of the latter. The PIC:POC ratio increased in E. huxleyi and was constant in C. leptoporus and S. pulchra. Elevated pCO2 has a significant effect on these three coccolithophore species, the haploid stage being more sensitive. This effect must be taken into account when predicting the fate of coccolithophores in the future ocean.
© 2011 Phycological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prymnesiophyceae; calcification; carbon dioxide; climate change; coccolithophores; haploid and diploid life stage; ocean acidification

Year:  2011        PMID: 27020352     DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.01080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phycol        ISSN: 0022-3646            Impact factor:   2.923


  6 in total

1.  Intraspecific Differences in Biogeochemical Responses to Thermal Change in the Coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi.

Authors:  Paul G Matson; Tanika M Ladd; Elisa R Halewood; Rahul P Sangodkar; Bradley F Chmelka; M Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Physiological responses of coccolithophores to abrupt exposure of naturally low pH deep seawater.

Authors:  Maria Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez; Bethan M Jones; Sonia Blanco-Ameijeiras; Mervyn Greaves; Maria Huete-Ortega; Mario Lebrato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Responses of the Emiliania huxleyi proteome to ocean acidification.

Authors:  Bethan M Jones; M Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez; Paul J Skipp; Richard J Edwards; Mervyn J Greaves; Jeremy R Young; Henry Elderfield; C David O'Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  End of the century pCO₂ levels do not impact calcification in Mediterranean cold-water corals.

Authors:  Cornelia Maier; Alexander Schubert; Maria M Berzunza Sànchez; Markus G Weinbauer; Pierre Watremez; Jean-Pierre Gattuso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A coastal coccolithophore maintains pH homeostasis and switches carbon sources in response to ocean acidification.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Liu; Robert A Eagle; Sarah M Aciego; Rosaleen E Gilmore; Justin B Ries
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material.

Authors:  Simen Alexander Linge Johnsen; Jörg Bollmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.