Literature DB >> 27020256

Rating and Classification of Incident Reporting in Radiology in a Large Academic Medical Center.

Mohammad Mansouri1, Shima Aran1, Khalid W Shaqdan1, Hani H Abujudeh2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a rate of safety incident report of adverse events in a large academic radiology department and to share the various types that may occur. This is a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant, institutional review board-approved study. Consent requirement was waived. All incident reports from April 2006-September 2012 were retrieved. Events were further classified as follows: diagnostic test orders, identity document or documentation or consent, safety or security or conduct, service coordination, surgery or procedure, line or tube, fall, medication or intravenous safety, employee general incident, environment or equipment, adverse drug reaction (ADR), skin or tissue, and diagnosis or treatment. Overall rates and subclassification rates were calculated. There were 10,224 incident reports and 4,324,208 radiology examinations (rate = 0.23%). The highest rates of the incident reports were due to diagnostic test orders (34.3%; 3509/10,224), followed by service coordination (12.2%; 1248/10,224) and ADR (10.3%; 1052/4,324,208). The rate of incident reporting was highest in inpatient (0.30%; 2949/970,622), followed by emergency radiology (0.22%; 1500/672,958) and outpatient (0.18%; 4957/2,680,628). Approximately 48.5% (4947/10,202) of incidents had no patient harm and did not affect the patient, followed by no patient harm, but did affect the patient (35.2%, 3589/10,202), temporary or minor patient harm (15.5%, 1584/10,202), permanent or major patient harm (0.6%, 62/10,202), and patient death (0.2%, 20/10,202). Within an academic radiology department, the rate of incident reports was only 0.23%, usually did not harm the patient, and occurred at higher rates in inpatients. The most common incident type was in the category of diagnostic test orders, followed by service coordination, and ADRs.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020256     DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol        ISSN: 0363-0188


  4 in total

1.  Gauging potential risk for patients in pediatric radiology by review of over 2,000 incident reports.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Snyder; Wei Zhang; Kimberly Chua Jasmin; Sam Thankachan; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-29

2.  Review of learning opportunity rates: correlation with radiologist assignment, patient type and exam priority.

Authors:  Marla B K Sammer; Marcus D Sammer; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  3D CNN with Visual Insights for Early Detection of Lung Cancer Using Gradient-Weighted Class Activation.

Authors:  Eali Stephen Neal Joshua; Debnath Bhattacharyya; Midhun Chakkravarthy; Yung-Cheol Byun
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Patient safety in nuclear medicine: identification of key strategic areas for vigilance and improvement.

Authors:  Ömer Kasalak; Derya Yakar; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.