Christina Hunter Chapman1, Joann I Prisciandaro1, Katherine E Maturen2, Yue Cao3, James M Balter4, Karen McLean5, Shruti Jolly6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: shrutij@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although recurrences and toxicity occur after vaginal cuff (VC) brachytherapy, little is known about dosimetry due to the inability to clearly visualize the VC on computed tomography (CT). T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in this setting, and we hypothesized that it could provide previously unascertainable dosimetric information. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a cohort of 32 patients who underwent cylinder-based brachytherapy for endometrial cancer with available MR simulation images, the VC was retrospectively contoured on T2W images, and cases were replanned to treat the upper VC to a dose of 7 Gy/fraction prescribed to 5 mm. Relevant dose-volume parameters for the VC were calculated. RESULTS: T2W MRI identified significant underdosing not observed on CT or T1-weighted imaging. Over two-thirds (69%) of patients had at least 1 cm(3) of VC that received less than 75% of the prescription dose and half (50%) of patients had a least 1 cm(3) of VC that received less than 50% of the prescription dose. The mean minimum point dose to the VC was 2.4 Gy, or 34% of the intended prescription dose (range: 0.53-6.4 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: We identified previously unreported VC underdosing in over two-thirds of our patients, with most of these patients having volumes of undistended VC that received less than half of the prescription dose. The maximum dimension was along the craniocaudal axis in some patients or left-right/anterior-posterior axis in others, suggesting that suture material may be restricting access to the vaginal apex and that alternative applicators may be needed when the diameter of the apex is larger than the introitus. Additional follow-up will be needed to determine whether underdosing is associated with isolated VC failure or whether low failure rates across the cohort suggest that some patients are being exposed to excessive dose and unnecessary risk of toxicity.
PURPOSE: Although recurrences and toxicity occur after vaginal cuff (VC) brachytherapy, little is known about dosimetry due to the inability to clearly visualize the VC on computed tomography (CT). T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in this setting, and we hypothesized that it could provide previously unascertainable dosimetric information. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a cohort of 32 patients who underwent cylinder-based brachytherapy for endometrial cancer with available MR simulation images, the VC was retrospectively contoured on T2W images, and cases were replanned to treat the upper VC to a dose of 7 Gy/fraction prescribed to 5 mm. Relevant dose-volume parameters for the VC were calculated. RESULTS: T2W MRI identified significant underdosing not observed on CT or T1-weighted imaging. Over two-thirds (69%) of patients had at least 1 cm(3) of VC that received less than 75% of the prescription dose and half (50%) of patients had a least 1 cm(3) of VC that received less than 50% of the prescription dose. The mean minimum point dose to the VC was 2.4 Gy, or 34% of the intended prescription dose (range: 0.53-6.4 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: We identified previously unreported VC underdosing in over two-thirds of our patients, with most of these patients having volumes of undistended VC that received less than half of the prescription dose. The maximum dimension was along the craniocaudal axis in some patients or left-right/anterior-posterior axis in others, suggesting that suture material may be restricting access to the vaginal apex and that alternative applicators may be needed when the diameter of the apex is larger than the introitus. Additional follow-up will be needed to determine whether underdosing is associated with isolated VC failure or whether low failure rates across the cohort suggest that some patients are being exposed to excessive dose and unnecessary risk of toxicity.
Authors: Ericka Wiebe; Harry Easton; Gillian Thomas; Lisa Barbera; Laura D'Alimonte; Ananth Ravi Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: William Small; Sushil Beriwal; D Jeffrey Demanes; Kathryn E Dusenbery; Patricia Eifel; Beth Erickson; Ellen Jones; Jason J Rownd; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Akila N Viswanathan; David Gaffney Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Carien L Creutzberg; Remi A Nout; Marnix L M Lybeert; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan J Jobsen; Jan-Willem M Mens; Ludy C H W Lutgens; Elisabeth Pras; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Wim L J van Putten Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hye-Chun Hur; Richard S Guido; Suketu M Mansuria; Michele R Hacker; Joseph S Sanfilippo; Ted T Lee Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.137
Authors: Stephanie M de Boer; Remi A Nout; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Jan J Jobsen; Ludy C H W Lutgens; Elzbieta M van der Steen-Banasik; Jan Willem M Mens; Annerie Slot; Marika C Stenfert Kroese; Simone Oerlemans; Hein Putter; Karen W Verhoeven-Adema; Hans W Nijman; Carien L Creutzberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: William Small; Walter R Bosch; Mathew M Harkenrider; Jonathan B Strauss; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Kevin V Albuquerque; Sushil Beriwal; Carien L Creutzberg; Patricia J Eifel; Beth A Erickson; Anthony W Fyles; Courtney L Hentz; Anuja Jhingran; Ann H Klopp; Charles A Kunos; Loren K Mell; Lorraine Portelance; Melanie E Powell; Akila N Viswanathan; Joseph H Yacoub; Catheryn M Yashar; Kathryn A Winter; David K Gaffney Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 7.038