Literature DB >> 27020109

Feasibility and Initial Dosimetric Findings for a Randomized Trial Using Dose-Painted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Targets in Prostate Cancer.

Elizabeth L Bossart1, Radka Stoyanova2, Kiri Sandler3, Matthew Studenski2, Amber Orman2, Matthew Abramowitz2, Alan Pollack2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare dosimetric characteristics with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-identified imaging tumor volume (gross tumor volume, GTV), prostate clinical target volume and planning target volume, and organs at risk (OARs) for 2 treatment techniques representing 2 arms of an institutional phase 3 randomized trial of hypofractionated external beam image guided highly targeted radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Group 1 (n=20) patients were treated before the trial inception with the standard dose prescription. Each patient had an additional treatment plan generated per the experimental arm. A total of 40 treatment plans were compared (20 plans for each technique). Group 2 (n=15) consists of patients currently accrued to the hypofractionated external beam image guided highly targeted radiation therapy trial. Plans were created as per the treatment arm, with additional plans for 5 of the group 2 experimental arm with a 3-mm expansion in the imaging GTV.
RESULTS: For all plans in both patient groups, planning target volume coverage ranged from 95% to 100%; GTV coverage of 89.3 Gy for the experimental treatment plans ranged from 95.2% to 99.8%. For both groups 1 and 2, the percent volumes of rectum/anus and bladder receiving 40 Gy, 65 Gy, and 80 Gy were smaller in the experimental plans than in the standard plans. The percent volume at 1 Gy per fraction and 1.625 Gy per fraction were compared between the standard and the experimental arms, and these were found to be equivalent.
CONCLUSIONS: The dose per fraction to the OARs can be made equal even when giving a large simultaneous integrated boost to the GTV. The data suggest that a GTV margin may be added without significant dose effects on the OARs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020109     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of Knowledge-Based Planning for Prostate Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Yihang Xu; Nellie Brovold; Jonathan Cyriac; Elizabeth Bossart; Kyle Padgett; Michael Butkus; Tejan Diwanj; Adam King; Alan Dal Pra; Matt Abramowitz; Alan Pollack; Nesrin Dogan
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  Validation of a deformable MRI to CT registration algorithm employing same day planning MRI for surrogate analysis.

Authors:  Kyle R Padgett; Radka Stoyanova; Sara Pirozzi; Perry Johnson; Jon Piper; Nesrin Dogan; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Assessment of specific versus combined purpose knowledge based models in prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bossart; Melissa Duffy; Garrett Simpson; Matthew Abramowitz; Alan Pollack; Nesrin Dogan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.