Literature DB >> 27019538

Velar-vowel coarticulation in a virtual target model of stop production.

Stefan A Frisch1, Sylvie M Wodzinski1.   

Abstract

Velar-vowel coarticulation in English, resulting in so-called velar fronting in front vowel contexts, was studied using ultrasound imaging of the tongue during /k/ onsets of monosyllabic words with no coda or a labial coda. Ten native English speakers were recorded and analyzed. A variety of coarticulation patterns that often appear to contain small differences in typical closure location for similar vowels was found. An account of the coarticulation pattern is provided using a virtual target model of stop consonant production where there are two /k/ allophones in English, one for front vowels and one for non-front vowels. Small differences in closure location along the palate between productions within each context are the result of the trajectory of movement of the tongue from the vowel to vowel through the virtual target beyond the limit of the palate. The overall pattern is thus seen as a combination of a large planned allophonic difference between consonant closure targets and smaller phonetic differences for each particular vowel quality that are the result of coarticulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anteriority index; EdgeTrak; English; coarticulation; consonant; fronting; production; ultrasound; velar; virtual target; vowel

Year:  2016        PMID: 27019538      PMCID: PMC4805126          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  20 in total

1.  The Haskins optically corrected ultrasound system (HOCUS).

Authors:  D H Whalen; Khalil Iskarous; Mark K Tiede; David J Ostry; Heike Lehnert-Lehouillier; Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson; Donald S Hailey
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Quantitative three-dimensional ultrasound analysis of tongue protrusion, grooving and symmetry: data from 12 normal speakers and a partial glossectomee.

Authors:  Tim Bressmann; Parveen Thind; Catherine Uy; Carmen Bollig; Ralph W Gilbert; Jonathan C Irish
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Do airstream mechanisms influence tongue movement paths?

Authors:  P Hoole
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 4.  Imaging the floor of the mouth and the sublingual space.

Authors:  Sarah J La'porte; Jaspal K Juttla; Ravi K Lingam
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

6.  A head and transducer support system for making ultrasound images of tongue/jaw movement.

Authors:  M Stone; E P Davis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Fronted velars, palatalized velars, and palatals.

Authors:  P Keating; A Lahiri
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements.

Authors:  S E Ohman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology.

Authors:  Janet B Pierrehumbert
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  The cushion scanning technique: a method of dynamic tongue sonography and its comparison with the transducer-skin coupling scanning technique during swallowing.

Authors:  C L Peng; P G Jost-Brinkmann; R R Miethke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.