Mark Egan1, Michael Daly2, Liam Delaney2. 1. Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, Stirling University, FK94LA, United Kingdom. Electronic address: mark.egan@stir.ac.uk. 2. Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, Stirling University, FK94LA, United Kingdom; UCD Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Several studies have shown a link between psychological distress in early life and subsequent higher unemployment, but none have used sibling models to account for the unobserved family background characteristics which may explain the relationship. OBJECTIVE: This paper uses the National Longitudinal Study of Youth 1997 data to examine whether adolescent psychological distress in 2000 predicts higher unemployment over 2000-11, whether this relationship changed in the period following the Great Recession, and whether it is robust to adjustment for family effects. METHODS: 7125 cohort members (2986 siblings) self-reported their mental health in 2000 and employment activities over 2000-11. This association was examined using Probit and ordinary least squares regressions controlling for intelligence, physical health, other sociodemographic characteristics and family background. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates and compared to those with low distress, highly distressed adolescents were 2.7 percentage points (32%) more likely to be unemployed, 5.1 points (26%) more likely to be unemployed or out of the labor force and experienced 11 weeks (28%) more unemployment. The impact of high distress was similar to a one standard deviation decrease in intelligence, and double the magnitude of having a serious physical health problem, and these estimates were robust to adjustment for family fixed-effects. The highly distressed were also disproportionately more likely to become unemployed or exit the labor force in the years following the Great Recession. CONCLUSION: These findings provide strong evidence of the unemployment penalty of early-life psychological distress and suggest that this relationship may be intensified during economic recessions. Investing in mental health in early life may be an effective way to reduce unemployment.
RATIONALE: Several studies have shown a link between psychological distress in early life and subsequent higher unemployment, but none have used sibling models to account for the unobserved family background characteristics which may explain the relationship. OBJECTIVE: This paper uses the National Longitudinal Study of Youth 1997 data to examine whether adolescent psychological distress in 2000 predicts higher unemployment over 2000-11, whether this relationship changed in the period following the Great Recession, and whether it is robust to adjustment for family effects. METHODS: 7125 cohort members (2986 siblings) self-reported their mental health in 2000 and employment activities over 2000-11. This association was examined using Probit and ordinary least squares regressions controlling for intelligence, physical health, other sociodemographic characteristics and family background. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates and compared to those with low distress, highly distressed adolescents were 2.7 percentage points (32%) more likely to be unemployed, 5.1 points (26%) more likely to be unemployed or out of the labor force and experienced 11 weeks (28%) more unemployment. The impact of high distress was similar to a one standard deviation decrease in intelligence, and double the magnitude of having a serious physical health problem, and these estimates were robust to adjustment for family fixed-effects. The highly distressed were also disproportionately more likely to become unemployed or exit the labor force in the years following the Great Recession. CONCLUSION: These findings provide strong evidence of the unemployment penalty of early-life psychological distress and suggest that this relationship may be intensified during economic recessions. Investing in mental health in early life may be an effective way to reduce unemployment.
Authors: Iman Alaie; Anna Philipson; Richard Ssegonja; William E Copeland; Mia Ramklint; Hannes Bohman; Ulf Jonsson Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Alice P Villatoro; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Jo C Phelan; Kirstin Painter; Bruce G Link Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jacob J Crouse; Kate M Chitty; Frank Iorfino; Django White; Alissa Nichles; Natalia Zmicerevska; Adam J Guastella; Ahmed A Moustafa; Daniel F Hermens; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 3.240