Literature DB >> 27018875

Multicenter cohort study on the survival time of cancer patients dying at home or in a hospital: Does place matter?

Jun Hamano1, Takashi Yamaguchi2, Isseki Maeda3, Akihiko Suga4, Takayuki Hisanaga5, Tatsuhiko Ishihara6, Tomoyuki Iwashita7, Keisuke Kaneishi8, Shohei Kawagoe9, Toshiyuki Kuriyama10, Takashi Maeda11, Ichiro Mori12, Nobuhisa Nakajima13, Tomohiro Nishi14, Hiroki Sakurai15, Satofumi Shimoyama16, Takuya Shinjo17, Hiroto Shirayama18, Takeshi Yamada19, Tatsuya Morita20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the place of death has a great influence on the quality of death and dying for cancer patients, whether the survival time differs according to the place of death is unclear. The primary aim of this study was to explore potential differences in the survival time of cancer patients dying at home or in a hospital.
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in Japan from September 2012 through April 2014 and involved 58 specialist palliative care services.
RESULTS: Among the 2426 patients recruited, 2069 patients were analyzed for this study: 1582 receiving hospital-based palliative care and 487 receiving home-based palliative care. A total of 1607 patients actually died in a hospital, and 462 patients died at home. The survival of patients who died at home was significantly longer than the survival of patients who died in a hospital in the days' prognosis group (estimated median survival time, 13 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.3-15.7 days] vs 9 days [95% CI, 8.0-10.0 days]; P = .006) and in the weeks' prognosis group (36 days [95% CI, 29.9-42.1 days] vs 29 days [95% CI, 26.5-31.5 days]; P = .007) as defined by Prognosis in Palliative Care Study predictor model A. No significant difference was identified in the months' prognosis group. Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that the place of death had a significant influence on the survival time in both unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96; P < .01) and adjusted models (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.97; P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with cancer patients who died in a hospital, cancer patients who died at home had similar or longer survival. Cancer 2016;122:1453-1460.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prognosis in Palliative Care Study (PiPS) predictor model; advanced cancer patients; place of death; survival time; type of palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27018875     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients treated with supportive care alone.

Authors:  Hironori Ashinuma; Masato Shingyoji; Yasushi Yoshida; Meiji Itakura; Toshihiko Iizasa; Yoshihiko Sakashita; Ikuo Sekine
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Palliative care and advance care planning for pancreas and other cancers.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Andrew S Epstein
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06

3.  Duration of palliative care involvement and immunotherapy treatment near the end of life among patients with cancer who died in-hospital.

Authors:  Juline Auclair; Stéphane Sanchez; Jan Chrusciel; Louise Hannetel; Matthieu Frasca; Guillaume Economos; Raphaelle Habert-Dantigny; Eduardo Bruera; Benoit Burucoa; Fiona Ecarnot; Isabelle Colombet; Cécile Barbaret
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Advance Directives, Hospitalization, and Survival Among Advanced Cancer Patients with Delirium Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ahmed F Elsayem; Eduardo Bruera; Alan Valentine; Carla L Warneke; Geri L Wood; Sai-Ching J Yeung; Valda D Page; Julio Silvestre; Patricia A Brock; Knox H Todd
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Comparison between minimally invasive spine stabilization with and without posterior decompression for the management of spinal metastases: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Uei; Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Masafumi Maseda; Masahiro Nakahashi; Hirokatsu Sawada; Enshi Nakayama; Hirotoki Soma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale.

Authors:  Hiroshi Uei; Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Masafumi Maseda; Masahiro Nakahashi; Hirokatsu Sawada; Koji Matsumoto; Hiroyuki Miyakata; Hirotoki Soma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberta I Jordan; Matthew J Allsop; Yousuf ElMokhallalati; Catriona E Jackson; Helen L Edwards; Emma J Chapman; Luc Deliens; Michael I Bennett
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Preferences for End-of-Life Care Among Patients With Terminal Cancer in China.

Authors:  Anli Leng; Elizabeth Maitland; Siyuan Wang; Stephen Nicholas; Kuixu Lan; Jian Wang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

9.  Impact of a Six-Year Project to Enhance the Awareness of Community-Based Palliative Care on the Place of Death.

Authors:  Nozomu Murakami; Kouichi Tanabe; Tatsuya Morita; Yasunaga Fujikawa; Shiro Koseki; Shinya Kajiura; Kazunori Nakajima; Ryuji Hayashi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Intensity of treatment in Swiss cancer patients at the end-of-life.

Authors:  Caroline Bähler; Andri Signorell; Eva Blozik; Oliver Reich
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.