Yao-Chun Hsu1, Lein-Ray Mo2, Chi-Yang Chang3, Ming-Shiang Wu4, Jia-Horng Kao5, Wen-Lun Wang3, Tzeng-Huey Yang6, Chaur-Shine Wang6, Ming-Feng Chiang6, Chieh-Chang Chen4, Yu-Jen Fang7, Hsu-Wei Hung8, Chun-Ying Wu9, Jaw-Town Lin10. 1. Center for Database Research, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; School of Medicine for International Students, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan. 2. Superintendent Office, Tainan Municipal Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan. 5. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan County, Taiwan. 7. Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yunlin County, Taiwan. 8. Taipei Institute of Pathology, Taipei City, Taiwan. 9. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: chun@vghtc.gov.tw. 10. School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study investigated whether serum level of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at the end of entecavir treatment was associated with risk of relapse. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter study of 161 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B in whom the hepatitis B virus was no longer detected after 3 years or more of entecavir therapy. Treatment ended between July 1, 2011 and July 1, 2015. Patients were monitored for clinical relapse (hepatitis B virus DNA >2000 IU/mL and level of alanine aminotransferase more than 2-fold the upper limit of normal) and virologic relapse (hepatitis B virus DNA >2000 IU/mL). Outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Two years after therapy ended, 49.2% of patients in the entire cohort had a clinical relapse (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.9%-58.1%) and 81.7% had a virologic relapse (95% CI, 74.3%-88.0%). Among patients who were hepatitis B e antigen-negative at the end of therapy, 39.2% had a clinical relapse (95% CI, 30.3%-49.6%) and 77.4% had a virologic relapse (95% CI, 68.6%-85.2%). Serum level of HBsAg was associated with relapse in the hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients (Ptrend = .006 for clinical relapse; Ptrend = .0001 for virologic relapse). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio (per log IU/mL increment) for clinical relapse was 2.47 (95% CI, 1.45-4.23) and for virologic relapse was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.33-2.45). The 11 (9%) patients with levels of HBsAg <10 IU/mL did not relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Serum level of HBsAg is associated with risk of relapse in patients who are hepatitis B e antigen-negative after treatment with entecavir. A low titer of HBsAg might be used to identify patients at low risk for relapse after treatment.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study investigated whether serum level of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at the end of entecavir treatment was associated with risk of relapse. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter study of 161 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B in whom the hepatitis B virus was no longer detected after 3 years or more of entecavir therapy. Treatment ended between July 1, 2011 and July 1, 2015. Patients were monitored for clinical relapse (hepatitis B virus DNA >2000 IU/mL and level of alanine aminotransferase more than 2-fold the upper limit of normal) and virologic relapse (hepatitis B virus DNA >2000 IU/mL). Outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Two years after therapy ended, 49.2% of patients in the entire cohort had a clinical relapse (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.9%-58.1%) and 81.7% had a virologic relapse (95% CI, 74.3%-88.0%). Among patients who were hepatitis B e antigen-negative at the end of therapy, 39.2% had a clinical relapse (95% CI, 30.3%-49.6%) and 77.4% had a virologic relapse (95% CI, 68.6%-85.2%). Serum level of HBsAg was associated with relapse in the hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients (Ptrend = .006 for clinical relapse; Ptrend = .0001 for virologic relapse). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio (per log IU/mL increment) for clinical relapse was 2.47 (95% CI, 1.45-4.23) and for virologic relapse was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.33-2.45). The 11 (9%) patients with levels of HBsAg <10 IU/mL did not relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Serum level of HBsAg is associated with risk of relapse in patients who are hepatitis B e antigen-negative after treatment with entecavir. A low titer of HBsAg might be used to identify patients at low risk for relapse after treatment.
Authors: Carla S Coffin; Scott K Fung; Fernando Alvarez; Curtis L Cooper; Karen E Doucette; Claire Fournier; Erin Kelly; Hin Hin Ko; Mang M Ma; Steven R Martin; Carla Osiowy; Alnoor Ramji; Edward Tam; Jean Pierre Villeneuve Journal: Can Liver J Date: 2018-12-25