Literature DB >> 27017558

Eosinophil Quantitated Urine Kinetic: A novel assay for assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Kenji M Cunnion1, Lauren K Willis2, Heather B Minto3, Tanya C Burch4, Alice L Werner2, Tushar A Shah5, Neel K Krishna6, Julius O Nyalwidhe4, Kelly M Maples2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease that requires long-term medical management and monitoring. The eosinophil count determined during esophageal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis and monitoring of EoE. Although markers of eosinophil degranulation correlate with symptoms, eosinophil counts do not correlate. Development of a noninvasive, cost-effective biomarker of eosinophil activation for the evaluation of EoE is an unmet medical need.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the potential for measuring urinary 3-bromotyrosine (3-BT) levels in creatinine normalized urine for quantifying eosinophil degranulation in EoE disease.
METHODS: A mass spectrometry-based method of measuring normalized 3-BT levels, the Eosinophil Quantitated Urine Kinetic (EoQUIK), was developed, and proof-of-concept evaluation was performed for patients with EoE (n = 27), atopic controls (n = 24), and nonatopic controls (n = 24).
RESULTS: EoQUIK revealed that median normalized 3-BT levels were increased 93-fold in patients with EoE compared with nonatopic controls (P = .01) and increased 13-fold in patients with EoE compared with atopic controls (P = .01). Cutoff thresholds were selected for EoQUIK that yielded a specificity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 100% for nonatopic controls and a specificity of 79% and a negative predictive value of 90% for atopic controls. In a logistic regression model, a urine 3-BT level greater than 20 pg per 400 mg of creatinine increased the odds of a patient having EoE by 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-20.5; P = .03) when compared with atopic controls after controlling for race and sex.
CONCLUSION: These data provide proof of concept that EoQUIK can potentially be a useful noninvasive clinical tool in the evaluation of possible EoE.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017558     DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  10 in total

Review 1.  A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Treatment Response in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Evan S Dellon; Sandeep K Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 2.  Latest Insights on the Relationship Between Symptoms and Biologic Findings in Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Safroneeva; Alex Straumann; Alain M Schoepfer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Noninvasive tests for eosinophilic esophagitis: Ready for use?

Authors:  Emily C McGowan; Seema S Aceves
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 6.248

4.  Minimally invasive biomarker studies in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brittany T Hines; Matthew A Rank; Benjamin L Wright; Lisa A Marks; John B Hagan; Alex Straumann; Matthew Greenhawt; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 5.  EoE disease monitoring: Where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Bridget Godwin; Benjamin Wilkins; Amanda B Muir
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.347

6.  An Evolving Approach to the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Hannah P Kim; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-06

7.  Noninvasive biomarkers identify eosinophilic esophagitis: A prospective longitudinal study in children.

Authors:  Joshua B Wechsler; Steven J Ackerman; Mirna Chehade; Katie Amsden; Mary E Riffle; Ming-Yu Wang; Jian Du; Matt L Kleinjan; Preeth Alumkal; Elizabeth Gray; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Barry K Wershil; Amir F Kagalwalla
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 14.710

8.  Accuracy and Safety of the Cytosponge for Assessing Histologic Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Two-Center Study.

Authors:  David A Katzka; Thomas C Smyrk; Jeffrey A Alexander; Debra M Geno; RoseMary A Beitia; Audrey O Chang; Nicholas J Shaheen; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Non-invasive biomarkers of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Martina Votto; Maria De Filippo; Riccardo Castagnoli; Francesco Delle Cave; Francesca Giffoni; Viola Santi; Marta Vergani; Carlo Caffarelli; Mara De Amici; Gian Luigi Marseglia; Amelia Licari
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-29

10.  One-Hour Esophageal String Test: A Nonendoscopic Minimally Invasive Test That Accurately Detects Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Steven J Ackerman; Amir F Kagalwalla; Ikuo Hirano; Nirmala Gonsalves; Paul Menard Katcher; Sandeep Gupta; Joshua B Wechsler; Milica Grozdanovic; Zhaoxing Pan; Joanne C Masterson; Jian Du; Robert J Fantus; Preeth Alumkal; James J Lee; Sergei Ochkur; Faria Ahmed; Kelley Capocelli; Hector Melin-Aldana; Kathryn Biette; Allison Dubner; Katie Amsden; Kaitlin Keeley; Maureen Sulkowski; Angelika Zalewski; Dan Atkins; Glenn T Furuta
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 10.864

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.