Literature DB >> 27017251

Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials.

Nehmat Houssami1, Kristina Lång2, Daniela Bernardi3, Alberto Tagliafico4, Sophia Zackrisson2, Per Skaane5.   

Abstract

This pictorial review highlights cancers detected only at tomosynthesis screening and screens falsely recalled in the course of breast tomosynthesis screening, illustrating both true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) detection attributed to tomosynthesis. Images and descriptive data were used to characterise cases of screen-detection with tomosynthesis, sourced from prospective screening trials that performed standard (2D) digital mammography (DM) and tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) in the same screening participants. Exemplar cases from four trials highlight common themes of relevance to screening practice including: the type of lesions frequently made more conspicuous or perceptible by tomosynthesis (spiculated masses, and architectural distortions); the histologic findings (both TP and FP) of tomosynthesis-only detection; and the need to extend breast work-up protocols (additional imaging including ultrasound and MRI, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsy) if tomosynthesis is adopted for primary screening.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer detection; Cancer screening; Digital breast tomosynthesis; False-positive recall; Mammography; Population screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017251     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  6 in total

Review 1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alice Chong; Susan P Weinstein; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Progress in the clinical detection of heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Long Song; Chuang Chen; Jing-Ping Yuan; Sheng-Rong Sun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Does three-dimensional functional infrared imaging improve breast cancer detection based on digital mammography in women with dense breasts?

Authors:  Roxanna J Hellgren; Ann E Sundbom; Kamila Czene; David Izhaky; Per Hall; Paul W Dickman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Influence of Tumor Subtype, Radiological Sign and Prognostic Factors on Tumor Size Discrepancies Between Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Final Histology.

Authors:  Alessandro Garlaschi; Massimo Calabrese; Federico Zaottini; Simona Tosto; Marco Gipponi; Paola Baccini; Maurizio Gallo; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Availability Versus Utilization of Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Post Passage of Breast Density Legislation.

Authors:  Mary W Marsh; Thad S Benefield; Sheila Lee; Michael Pritchard; Katie Earnhardt; Robert Agans; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  International Day of Radiology: Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Chantal Van Ongeval; Julie Soens; Mireille Van Goethem
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.