Literature DB >> 27017243

DIEAP flap for safe definitive autologous breast reconstruction.

Katrin Seidenstuecker1, Carl van Waes2, Beatrix I Munder1, Karel E Y Claes2, Christian Witzel1, Nathalie Roche2, Filip Stillaert2, Ajay L Mahajan3, Christoph Andree1, Phillip N Blondeel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the commonest form of cancer in women affecting almost a quarter of a million patients in the US annually. 30 percent of these patients and patients with genetic mutations undergo removal of the breast, as highlighted in a high profile celebrity patient. Although breast reconstruction with free microvascular transfer of a DIEAP flap from the abdomen is an ideal form of reconstruction, there have been misgivings about the complexity and potential complications. This study was aimed at clearing these misunderstandings and establishing the value of this form of breast reconstruction.
METHODS: 1036 DIEAP flap breast reconstructions carried out at the University Hospital, Gent (five year period) and at the Sana Kliniken, Düsseldorf (three year period) were included prospectively. Comorbid factors like chemotherapy, radiotherapy, patient age >65 years, BMI >30 and smoking were recorded. Outcomes were evaluated over a mean follow up of 2 years.
RESULTS: Overall complication rate related to the reconstructed breast and donor abdominal area was 6.8 percent. Total flap loss was seen in only 0.8 percent. The mean operating time was less than five hours. Older age, higher BMI, chemotherapy and radiotherapy did not have a significant influence on complication rates, however smoking resulted in significant delay in wound healing in the breast (p = 0.025) and abdominal wounds (p = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: The DIEAP flap is an excellent option for breast reconstruction, with a low level of donor site morbidity and complications. It is an autologous reconstruction that provides a stable long term result.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous breast reconstruction; Breast reconstruction; DIEAP flap breast reconstruction; Free flap breast reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017243     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  6 in total

1.  Hybrid breast reconstruction-the best of both worlds.

Authors:  Suhail Kanchwala; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

2.  Viability of five different pre- and intraoperative imaging methods for autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  K F Schrögendorfer; S Nickl; M Keck; D B Lumenta; C Loewe; M Gschwandtner; W Haslik; J Nedomansky
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 0.953

3.  Conversion of Breast Implants into Natural Breast Reconstruction: Evaluating Lipofilled Mini Dorsi Flap.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Piat; Vincenzo Giovinazzo; Aurore Talha; Gabriela Dinnebier Tomazzoni; Anna Paula Maiato; Lucas Roskamp Budel; Christophe Ho Quoc
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-25

4.  Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Camilo Hernandez Gallego; Helena Aineskog; Andres Rodriguez-Lorenzo; Maria Mani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-29

5.  Automatic detection of perforators for microsurgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Carlos Mavioso; Ricardo J Araújo; Hélder P Oliveira; João C Anacleto; Maria Antónia Vasconcelos; David Pinto; Pedro F Gouveia; Celeste Alves; Fátima Cardoso; Jaime S Cardoso; Maria João Cardoso
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: focus on donor site morbidity.

Authors:  Laura C Siegwart; Sebastian Fischer; Yannick F Diehm; Jörg M Heil; Christoph Hirche; Ulrich Kneser; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.239

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.