INTRODUCTION: The UPDRS-IV represents the most common screening tool to assess motor fluctuations in patients with PD despite the lack of a clinimetric validation. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of UPDRS-IV using a 12-h waking-day motor assessment as the gold standard. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled PD patients who underwent a 12-h waking-day motor assessment in the study. Patients were clinically evaluated every 2 h for 12 h using the UPDRS-III. Motor scores were reported as a line graph and six blinded raters classified patients as having or not having motor fluctuations. The UPDRS-IV was used in order to assess the presence of predictable and unpredictable motor fluctuations according to items 36-38. RESULTS: Sixty two PD patients were enrolled in the study. According to the raters' evaluations, 39 (62.9%) were classified as having motor fluctuations, while according to the UPDRS-IV 47 (75.8%) presented a motor fluctuation giving a sensitivity of 87.2% (95%CI 72.6-95.7) and a specificity of 43.5% (95%CI 23.2-65.5). CONCLUSION: Our study results confirm the high level of sensitivity with a lower level of specificity of UPDRS-IV to screen motor fluctuations in PD patients.
INTRODUCTION: The UPDRS-IV represents the most common screening tool to assess motor fluctuations in patients with PD despite the lack of a clinimetric validation. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of UPDRS-IV using a 12-h waking-day motor assessment as the gold standard. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled PDpatients who underwent a 12-h waking-day motor assessment in the study. Patients were clinically evaluated every 2 h for 12 h using the UPDRS-III. Motor scores were reported as a line graph and six blinded raters classified patients as having or not having motor fluctuations. The UPDRS-IV was used in order to assess the presence of predictable and unpredictable motor fluctuations according to items 36-38. RESULTS: Sixty two PDpatients were enrolled in the study. According to the raters' evaluations, 39 (62.9%) were classified as having motor fluctuations, while according to the UPDRS-IV 47 (75.8%) presented a motor fluctuation giving a sensitivity of 87.2% (95%CI 72.6-95.7) and a specificity of 43.5% (95%CI 23.2-65.5). CONCLUSION: Our study results confirm the high level of sensitivity with a lower level of specificity of UPDRS-IV to screen motor fluctuations in PDpatients.