Mary E Klingensmith1, John R Potts2, Walter H Merrill3, Timothy J Eberlein4, Robert S Rhodes5, Stanley W Ashley6, R James Valentine3, John G Hunter7, Steven C Stain8. 1. Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: klingensmithm@wustl.edu. 2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL. 3. Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 4. Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. 5. American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA. 6. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 7. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR. 8. Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Early Specialization Program (ESP) in surgery was designed by the American Board of Surgery, the American Board of Thoracic Surgery, and the Residency Review Committees for Surgery and Thoracic Surgery to allow surgical trainees dual certification in general surgery (GS) and either vascular surgery (VS) or cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) after 6 to 7 years of training. After more than 10 years' experience, this analysis was undertaken to evaluate efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: American Board of Surgery and American Board of Thoracic Surgery records of VS and CTS ESP trainees were queried to evaluate qualifying exam and certifying exam performance. Case logs were examined and compared with contemporaneous non-ESP trainees. Opinions of programs directors of GS, VS, and CTS and ESP participants were solicited via survey. RESULTS: Twenty-six CTS ESP residents have completed training at 10 programs and 16 VS ESP at 6 programs. First-time pass rates on American Board of Surgery qualifying and certifying exams were superior to time-matched peers; greater success in specialty specific examinations was also found. Trainees met required case minimums for GS despite shortened time in GS. By survey, 85% of programs directors endorsed satisfaction with ESP, and 90% endorsed graduate readiness for independent practice. Early Specialization Program participants report increased mentorship and independence, greater competence for practice, and overall satisfaction with ESP. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in ESP programs in VS and CTS were successful in passing GS and specialty exams and achieving required operative cases, despite an accelerated training track. Programs directors and participants report satisfaction with the training and confidence that ESP graduates are prepared for independent practice. This documented success supports ESP training in any surgical subspecialty, including comprehensive GS.
BACKGROUND: The Early Specialization Program (ESP) in surgery was designed by the American Board of Surgery, the American Board of Thoracic Surgery, and the Residency Review Committees for Surgery and Thoracic Surgery to allow surgical trainees dual certification in general surgery (GS) and either vascular surgery (VS) or cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) after 6 to 7 years of training. After more than 10 years' experience, this analysis was undertaken to evaluate efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: American Board of Surgery and American Board of Thoracic Surgery records of VS and CTS ESP trainees were queried to evaluate qualifying exam and certifying exam performance. Case logs were examined and compared with contemporaneous non-ESP trainees. Opinions of programs directors of GS, VS, and CTS and ESP participants were solicited via survey. RESULTS: Twenty-six CTS ESP residents have completed training at 10 programs and 16 VS ESP at 6 programs. First-time pass rates on American Board of Surgery qualifying and certifying exams were superior to time-matched peers; greater success in specialty specific examinations was also found. Trainees met required case minimums for GS despite shortened time in GS. By survey, 85% of programs directors endorsed satisfaction with ESP, and 90% endorsed graduate readiness for independent practice. Early Specialization Program participants report increased mentorship and independence, greater competence for practice, and overall satisfaction with ESP. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in ESP programs in VS and CTS were successful in passing GS and specialty exams and achieving required operative cases, despite an accelerated training track. Programs directors and participants report satisfaction with the training and confidence that ESP graduates are prepared for independent practice. This documented success supports ESP training in any surgical subspecialty, including comprehensive GS.
Authors: Darren R Cullinan; Paul E Wise; Keith A Delman; John R Potts; Michael M Awad; Timothy J Eberlein; Mary E Klingensmith Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alexander R Cortez; Leah K Winer; Gianna D Katsaros; Al-Faraaz Kassam; Shimul A Shah; Tayyab S Diwan; R Cutler Quillin Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 3.452