Literature DB >> 27016906

Conservative vs Surgical Interventions for Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mehmet Kaplan1, Onder Ozcan2, Fatma Cigdem Kaplan3, Huseyin Cahit Yalcin4, Bulent Salman5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Umbilical pilonidal sinus (UPS) is one of the most neglected disorders, and there is still no clear consensus regarding optimal treatment of the disease. We therefore present our data from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing conservative vs surgical treatment of UPS. STUDY
DESIGN: The study was conducted in Turkey between January 2012 and November 2015. All eligible patients with the diagnosis of UPS (n = 84) were randomized for either conservative treatment (CT, n = 42) or surgical treatment (ST, n = 42). All patients were followed up for at least 2 years; then, the results of both groups were compared. The primary outcomes were initial healing, recurrence, and the cure rate of the disease after each treatment modality.
RESULTS: Mean (± SD) age of the patients was 20.83 ± 5.73 years old, and the majority were men (94%). Nearly 60% of the patients had a deep navel, and 55% had intense hair status. The main symptoms were drainage and wetness, pain, itching, and malodor. Overall, in 10 (27.8%) patients, relapse of the disease was observed in the CT group; it was observed in only 1 patient in the ST group (p = 0.002). Initial healing time was significantly shorter in the ST group (p = 0.001). Of the 81 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up, a cure could be obtained in only 28 of 41 patients in the CT group; it was achieved in all 40 patients in the ST group (68.3% vs 100%, respectively; p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence that surgical treatment is superior to conservative surgery regarding the primary and secondary outcomes of UPS at least 2 years after surgery.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016906     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: "Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus: A Report of Two Cases and Recent Update of Literature".

Authors:  Mehmet Kaplan; Elif Tugce Kaplan; Tugba Kaplan; Fatma Cigdem Kaplan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Comment to "An umbilical surprise: a collective review on umbilical pilonidal sinus". J. B. Ponten, J. E. H. Ponten, M. D. P. Luyer, S. W. Nienhuijs.

Authors:  M Kaplan; F Ç Kaplan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Laser may reduce recurrence rate in pilonidal sinus disease by reducing captured occipital hair.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Laser treatment of umbilical pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Branko Bogdanic
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus, an Underestimated and Little-Known Clinical Entity: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Mehmet Kaplan; Elif Tugce Kaplan; Tugba Kaplan; Fatma Cigdem Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-15

6.  Rare case of umbilical urachal sinus mimicking infected umbilical abscess: A case report.

Authors:  Hossein Torabi; Kasra Shirini; Rona Ghaffari
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.