Literature DB >> 27016875

Within-Provider Variability in Motivational Interviewing Integrity for Three Years after MI Training: Does Time Heal?

Chris Dunn1, Doyanne Darnell2, David C Atkins2, Kevin A Hallgren2, Zac E Imel3, Kristin Bumgardner2, Mandy Owens2, Peter Roy-Byrne2.   

Abstract

This study examined variability in Motivational Interviewing (MI) integrity among 15 providers for three years following training. Data come from an effectiveness trial in which providers were trained to deliver brief single-session MI interventions. Each session was audio-recorded and coded for MI integrity using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 rating system. Within-provider variation in MI integrity was large, especially for behavior count scores (e.g., open questions, complex reflections) and only slightly smaller for global session scores of MI Spirit and Empathy. Within-provider variability was in most cases larger than between-provider variability and there was no evidence that providers improved appreciably over time. These findings raise concerns about the quality of MI being delivered in large-scale implementation efforts and have implications for the monitoring and training of higher quality MI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Adherence; Fidelity; Implementation; Integrity; Motivational Interviewing; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016875     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  11 in total

1.  An intervention to improve provider-patient interaction at methadone maintenance treatment in China.

Authors:  Li Li; Li-Jung Liang; Chunqing Lin; Nan Feng; Wei Cao; Zunyou Wu
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-02-03

2.  Effects of Fidelity-Focused Consultation on Clinicians' Implementation: An Exploratory Multiple Baseline Design.

Authors:  E B Caron; Mary Dozier
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2019-07

3.  Self-Coding of Fidelity as a Potential Active Ingredient of Consultation to Improve Clinicians' Fidelity.

Authors:  E B Caron; Mary Dozier
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-09-09

4.  Measuring motivational interviewing self-efficacy of pre-service students completing a competency-based motivational interviewing course.

Authors:  Elizabeth Larson; Beth A Martin
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2021-04-17

5.  Benchmarking Treatment Adherence and Therapist Competence in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Youth Anxiety Disorders.

Authors:  Bryce D McLeod; Michael A Southam-Gerow; Amanda Jensen-Doss; Aaron Hogue; Philip C Kendall; John R Weisz
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2017-10-20

6.  Variability in motivational interviewing adherence across sessions, providers, sites, and research contexts.

Authors:  Kevin A Hallgren; Aaron Dembe; Brian T Pace; Zac E Imel; Christine M Lee; David C Atkins
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-10-28

7.  A randomized controlled trial to influence client language in substance use disorder treatment.

Authors:  Theresa B Moyers; Jon Houck; Lisa H Glynn; Kevin A Hallgren; Jennifer K Manuel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  The dissemination of motivational interviewing in Swedish county councils: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria Beckman; Lars Forsberg; Helena Lindqvist; Margarita Diez; Johanna Enö Persson; Ata Ghaderi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of a Level I trauma center provider training in patient-centered alcohol brief interventions using the Behavior Change Counseling Index rated by standardized patients.

Authors:  Doyanne Darnell; Lea Parker; Allison Engstrom; Dylan Fisher; Kaylie Diteman; Christopher Dunn
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2019-12-29

10.  Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.

Authors:  Vegard Stolsmo Foldal; Marit Solbjør; Martin Inge Standal; Egil Andreas Fors; Roger Hagen; Gunnhild Bagøien; Roar Johnsen; Karen Walseth Hara; Heidi Fossen; Ida Løchting; Hedda Eik; Margreth Grotle; Lene Aasdahl
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.