L Smith1, O McCourt2, A Sawyer2, M Ucci3, A Marmot3, J Wardle2, A Fisher2. 1. Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK, lee.smith@ucl.ac.uk. 2. Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 3. UCL, Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment, London NW1 2BX, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical activity reduces the risk of morbidity and high sedentary time may be associated with negative health outcomes. The workplace offers an arena to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary time, but existing workplace-based interventions have typically yielded small effects. AIMS: To collate the literature on correlates of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour and to inform future novel approaches to workplace-based intervention or policy. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted in December 2014 using multiple databases. Identified papers were screened against an inclusion criterion. Papers were deemed eligible for this review if they included occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour as an outcome, were quantitative observational studies and included an adult working population. Identified correlates of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour were organized into levels of the socioecological model. RESULTS: Forty studies met the inclusion criterion. A higher number of studies included only occupational physical activity, not sedentary time, as an outcome and were carried out in the USA and Australia. The review identified that white-collar workers are at greater risk of low occupational physical activity and high sedentary time. The majority of correlates found to be associated with occupational physical activity and sedentary time were intrapersonal and non-modifiable. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention efforts to increase occupational physical activity and reduce sedentary time may be most effective when targeted at white-collar workers. Research is needed to identify additional modifiable correlates of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour, in white-collar workers.
BACKGROUND: Physical activity reduces the risk of morbidity and high sedentary time may be associated with negative health outcomes. The workplace offers an arena to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary time, but existing workplace-based interventions have typically yielded small effects. AIMS: To collate the literature on correlates of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour and to inform future novel approaches to workplace-based intervention or policy. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted in December 2014 using multiple databases. Identified papers were screened against an inclusion criterion. Papers were deemed eligible for this review if they included occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour as an outcome, were quantitative observational studies and included an adult working population. Identified correlates of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour were organized into levels of the socioecological model. RESULTS: Forty studies met the inclusion criterion. A higher number of studies included only occupational physical activity, not sedentary time, as an outcome and were carried out in the USA and Australia. The review identified that white-collar workers are at greater risk of low occupational physical activity and high sedentary time. The majority of correlates found to be associated with occupational physical activity and sedentary time were intrapersonal and non-modifiable. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention efforts to increase occupational physical activity and reduce sedentary time may be most effective when targeted at white-collar workers. Research is needed to identify additional modifiable correlates of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour, in white-collar workers.
Authors: Lin Yang; J Aaron Hipp; Jung Ae Lee; Rachel G Tabak; Elizabeth A Dodson; Christine M Marx; Ross C Brownson Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2017-03-22
Authors: Beverly Msambichaka; Ramadhani Abdul; Salim Abdulla; Paul Klatser; Marcel Tanner; Ramaiya Kaushik; Bettina Bringolf-Isler; Eveline Geubbels; Ikenna C Eze Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephanie A Prince; Cara G Elliott; Kyle Scott; Sarah Visintini; Jennifer L Reed Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Dominic Mosha; Heavenlight A Paulo; Mary Mwanyika-Sando; Innocent B Mboya; Isabel Madzorera; Germana H Leyna; Sia E Msuya; Till W Bärnighausen; Japhet Killewo; Wafaie W Fawzi Journal: BMC Nutr Date: 2021-07-16
Authors: Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J L Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Linda H Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Noe C Crespo; Mark A Pereira; Matthew P Buman Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Bronwyn K Clark; Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander; Mitch J Duncan; Wendy Brown Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Javier Palarea-Albaladejo; Adrian Bauman; Nidhi Gupta; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Andreas Holtermann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.390