Literature DB >> 27016644

A 12-month multicenter, randomized study comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system with the etonogestrel subdermal implant.

Dan Apter1, Paula Briggs2, Marjo Tuppurainen3, Julia Grunert4, Eeva Lukkari-Lax5, Sarah Rybowski6, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 8), which has an average levonorgestrel release rate of ∼8 μg/24 hours during the first year (total levonorgestrel content 13.5 mg; Jaydess/Skyla), with the etonogestrel (ENG) subdermal implant (total content, 68 mg) with regard to the 12-month discontinuation rate (primary outcome).
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, phase III study.
SETTING: Thirty-eight centers in six European countries. PATIENT(S): Study population of 766 healthy nulliparous and parous women aged 18-35 years. INTERVENTION(S): The LNG-IUS 8 or the ENG implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Discontinuation rate, by treatment group, at Month 12. RESULT(S): The 12-month discontinuation rates were 19.6% and 26.8% in the LNG-IUS 8 and ENG implant groups, respectively. The -7.2% difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval -13.2%, -1.2%). Fewer women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group discontinued because of increased bleeding (3.2% vs. 11.3%) or adverse events (14.3% vs. 21.8%). At 12 months, more women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group were "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern (60.9% vs. 33.6%) and reported a preference to use their study treatment after study completion (70.1% vs. 58.5%). CONCLUSION(S): The LNG-IUS 8 was associated with a significantly lower 12-month discontinuation rate compared with the ENG implant; mainly because ENG implant users frequently discontinued due to increased bleeding. More LNG-IUS 8 users than ENG implant users reported being "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern, and reported a preference to continue using their study treatment after the study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01397097.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LARC; LNG-IUS; contraception; discontinuation; etonogestrel implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016644     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  Etonogestrel implant effectiveness.

Authors:  Nicolas Dugré; Nidhi Choksi; Jessica Kirkwood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.025

2.  Relationship Between Etonogestrel Concentrations and Bleeding Patterns in Contraceptive Implant Users.

Authors:  Aaron Lazorwitz; Christina L Aquilante; Eva Dindinger; Margaret Harrison; Jeanelle Sheeder; Stephanie Teal
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Treatment of Unfavorable Bleeding Patterns in Contraceptive Implant Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Bliss Kaneshiro; Katharine B Simmons; Jennifer L Hauschildt; Kise Bond; Emily R Boniface; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 4.  There might be blood: a scoping review on women's responses to contraceptive-induced menstrual bleeding changes.

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Rubina Hussain; Amanda Berry
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Randomized trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy, safety and acceptability of a two-rod contraceptive implant over 4 years in the Dominican Republic.

Authors:  M J Steiner; V Brache; D Taylor; R Callahan; V Halpern; A Jorge; S Wevill; J Sergison; L Venkatasubramanian; L Dorflinger
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019

6.  A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant.

Authors:  Kusum V Moray; Himanshu Chaurasia; Oshima Sachin; Beena Joshi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Effects of Etonogestrel implants on pelvic pain and menstrual flow in women suffering from adenomyosis or endometriosis: Results from a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Xiaocen Niu; Qun Luo; Chunfen Wang; Lihua Zhu; Lili Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 9.  Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.

Authors:  Jamie Krashin; Jennifer H Tang; Sheila Mody; Laureen M Lopez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-17

10.  Progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Vanessa Jordan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.