| Literature DB >> 27016485 |
Shotaro Hirase1, Hirohiko Takeshima2, Mutsumi Nishida3, Wataru Iwasaki4.
Abstract
Reliably rooted phylogenetic trees play irreplaceable roles in clarifying diversification in the patterns of species and populations. However, such trees are often unavailable in phylogeographic studies, particularly when the focus is on rapidly expanded populations that exhibit star-like trees. A fundamental bottleneck is known as the random rooting effect, where a distant outgroup tends to root an unrooted tree "randomly." We investigated whether parallel mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) sequencing alleviates this effect in phylogeography using a case study on the Sea of Japan lineage of the intertidal goby Chaenogobius annularis Eighty-three C. annularis individuals were collected and their mitogenomes were determined by high-throughput and low-cost parallel sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis of these mitogenome sequences was conducted to root the Sea of Japan lineage, which has a star-like phylogeny and had not been reliably rooted. The topologies of the bootstrap trees were investigated to determine whether the use of mitogenomes alleviated the random rooting effect. The mitogenome data successfully rooted the Sea of Japan lineage by alleviating the effect, which hindered phylogenetic analysis that used specific gene sequences. The reliable rooting of the lineage led to the discovery of a novel, northern lineage that expanded during an interglacial period with high bootstrap support. Furthermore, the finding of this lineage suggested the existence of additional glacial refugia and provided a new recent calibration point that revised the divergence time estimation between the Sea of Japan and Pacific Ocean lineages. This study illustrates the effectiveness of parallel mitogenome sequencing for solving the random rooting problem in phylogeographic studies.Entities:
Keywords: Chaenogobius annularis; Sea of Japan; divergence time estimation; mitogenome; phylogeography; random rooting
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27016485 PMCID: PMC4860695 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evw063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
FSampling locations of C. annularis in and around the Japanese archipelago. The upper-left inset map shows the coastlines during the last glacial period (Crusius et al. 1999).
Sampling Locations of Chaenogobius annularis and Genetic Diversity in Each Location
| Location | Latitude, Longitude | No. of Individuals Examined | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sea of Japan lineage | ||||
| Otaru, Hokkaido Pref. | 43°14′N, 141°0′E | 5 | 0.800 | 0.121 |
| Shiriuchi, Hokkaido Pref. | 41°31′N, 140°25′E | 6 | 1.000 | 0.211 |
| Hachinohe, Aomori Pref. | 40°32′N, 141°33′E | 6 | 1.000 | 0.082 |
| Aomori, Aomori Pref. | 40°53′N, 140°51′E | 5 | 0.900 | 0.251 |
| Fukaura, Aomori Pref. | 40°44′N, 139°59′E | 5 | 1.000 | 0.209 |
| Murakami, Niigata Pref. | 38°16′N, 139°26′E | 8 | 1.000 | 0.259 |
| Kyotango, Kyoto Pref. | 35°41′N, 135°2′E | 5 | 1.000 | 0.243 |
| Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi Pref. | 33°57′N, 130°52′E | 7 | 0.952 | 0.147 |
| Busan | 35°12′N, 129°13′E | 5 | 0.800 | 0.292 |
| Gangneung, Gangwon Prov. | 37°51′N, 128°51′E | 2 | 1.000 | 0.024 |
| Pacific Ocean lineage | ||||
| Ofunato, Iwate Pref. | 38°59′N, 141°44′E | 3 | 0.667 | 0.037 |
| Onagawa, Miyagi Pref. | 38°26′N, 141°27′E | 4 | 0.833 | 0.198 |
| Hitachinaka, Ibaraki Pref. | 36°21′N, 140°37′E | 5 | 1.000 | 0.150 |
| Omaezaki, Shizuoka Pref. | 34°35′N, 138°13′E | 3 | 1.000 | 0.087 |
| Toba, Mie Pref. | 34°27′N, 136°52′E | 2 | 1.000 | 0.268 |
| Konan, Kochi Pref. | 33°26′N, 133°23′E | 4 | 1.000 | 0.360 |
| Iyo, Ehime Pref. | 33°42′N, 132°39′E | 6 | 1.000 | 0.749 |
| Both lineages | ||||
| Miyako, Iwate Pref. | 39°46′N, 141°59′E | 2 | 1.000 | 5.226 |
Note.—h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity.
FA phylogenetic tree of 75 mitogenomes (haplotypes) of C. annularis and one of G. petschiliensis. Branch lengths are proportional to estimated numbers of nucleotide substitutions per site. Closed circles and numbers indicate strongly (>80%) supported geographical clades and their bootstrap values, respectively.
Bootstrap Values of the Northern Lineage without and with the Outgroup
| Length | Without Outgroup | With Outgroup | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 975 | 85 | 56 | |
| 1,044 | 37 | 24 | |
| 1,554 | 48 | 30 | |
| 690 | 0 | 0 | |
| 156 | 0 | 0 | |
| 675 | 35 | 30 | |
| 783 | 32 | 6 | |
| 348 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,380 | 12 | 0 | |
| 288 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,836 | 0 | 0 | |
| 522 | 44 | 17 | |
| 1,140 | 49 | 20 | |
| 12S rRNA | 946 | 0 | 0 |
| 16S rRNA | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| Control region | 835 | 0 | 0 |
| tRNAs | 1,521 | 83 | 25 |
| Mitogenome | 16,426 | 100 | 98 |
FProportions of branches of the Sea of Japan lineage to which the outgroup branch was connected among the bootstrap trees of the ND1 gene. The outgroup branch was connected to diverse ingroup branches, failing to root the tree reliably.
FMismatch distribution in the northern lineage mitogenomes. Observed (histogram) and simulated (line) frequencies of pairwise nucleotide differences between the mitogenome sequences are shown.
Tajima’s D Value of the Northern Lineage in Each Region of Mitogenome
| All | Synonymous | Nonsynonymous | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substitutions | Substitutions | Substitutions | |
| −2.34 | −1.98 | −1.81 | |
| −2.06 | −1.95 | −1.89 | |
| −2.35 | −2.19 | −1.71 | |
| −1.60 | −1.60 | NA | |
| −1.31 | −1.12 | −1.12 | |
| −2.03 | −1.52 | −2.01 | |
| −2.01 | −1.56 | −1.76 | |
| −1.82 | −1.35 | −1.48 | |
| −2.37 | −2.14 | −2.32 | |
| −1.81 | −1.44 | −1.12 | |
| −2.20 | −2.17 | −1.98 | |
| −1.86 | −1.82 | −1.64 | |
| −2.08 | −2.08 | −1.81 | |
| 12S rRNA | −1.47 | — | — |
| 16S rRNA | −2.18 | — | — |
| Control region | −1.74 | — | — |
| tRNAs | −2.37 | — | — |
Note.—NA, not applicable.
P < 0.05.
Estimation of Divergence Time between the Pacific Ocean and Sea of Japan Lineages
| TMRCA of Northern Lineage | 9–19 ka | 125–135 ka | 238–248 ka | 332–342 ka |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average time (95% confidence intervals) | ||||
| Divergence between tde Pacific Ocean and Sea of Japan lineages | — | 3.37 (1.18–5.56) Ma | 6.30 (2.20–10.40) Ma | 8.74 (3.06–14.42) Ma |
| Evolutionary rate | ||||
| | 40.0%/Myr | 4.3%/Myr | 2.3%/Myr | 1.7%/Myr |
| | 14.9%/Myr | 1.6%/Myr | 0.9%/Myr | 0.6%/Myr |
| | 27.0%/Myr | 2.9%/Myr | 1.6%/Myr | 1.1%/Myr |
| | 21.1%/Myr | 2.3%/Myr | 1.2%/Myr | 0.9%/Myr |
| 16S rRNA (reported rate: 0.8–1.2%/Myr | 13.3%/Myr | 1.4%/Myr | 0.8%/Myr | 0.6%/Myr |
| Control region (reported rate: 3.6%/Myr | 44.4%/Myr | 4.8%/Myr | 2.6%/Myr | 1.8%/Myr |
Note.—TMRCA, the time of the most recent common ancestor.
Evolutionary rates used as reference: aBermingham et al. (1997);
bHarada et al. (2002); Sota et al. (2005);
cTringali et al. (1999);
dDonaldson and Wilson (1999).