Literature DB >> 27016317

Validation of an 'endovascular-first' approach to spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: an intention-to-treat analysis.

Bradley A Gross1, Felipe C Albuquerque1, Karam Moon1, Cameron G McDougall1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) require pretreatment angiography; embolization can be performed in the same session. To validate this approach, obliteration and morbidity rates of 'endovascular-first' (embolization and microsurgery in the case of embolization failures) must be compared with rates for 'microsurgery-first' (microsurgical ligation without attempted embolization) approaches.
METHODS: We reviewed our institutional database (January 1998-October 2015) for SDAVFs, performing an intention-to-treat analysis comparing endovascular-first and microsurgery-first approaches.
RESULTS: A total of 71 patients underwent surgical and/or endovascular treatment for SDAVFs. All SDAVFs were ultimately occluded. Of 35 patients under consideration for an endovascular-first approach, radicular artery anatomy or anterior spinal artery embolization risk precluded attempting embolization in seven cases (20%). Among 28 patients undergoing embolization, angiographic non-opacification of the fistula was noted in 18 (64%). Fourteen patients had obliteration with excellent casting of the draining vein (50%) and did not undergo surgery. There were no significant differences in total complications (9% vs 11%; p=1.0) or permanent complications (3% vs 4%; p=1.0) after attempted endovascular and surgical treatment. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences in total complications (11% vs 14%; p=1.0), permanent complications (6% vs 3%; p=0.61), or the symptomatic resolution/improvement rate (80% vs 78%; p=1.0) between endovascular-first and microsurgery-first groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support attempted embolization of SDAVFs prior to consideration of microsurgery, allowing for a less invasive treatment option in the same session as diagnostic angiography. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fistula; Liquid Embolic Material; Spine; Vascular Malformation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016317     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  3 in total

1.  A Review of Vascular Abnormalities of the Spine.

Authors:  Rahul Singh; Brandon Lucke-Wold; Kymberly Gyure; Sohyun Boo
Journal:  Ann Vasc Med Res       Date:  2016-12-21

2.  [Clinical outcomes following microsurgery and endovascular embolization in the management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A meta-analysis study].

Authors:  C W Yuan; Y J Wang; S J Zhang; S L Shen; H Z Duan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Myelopathy secondary to an intramedullary arteriovenous malformation in a mature dog.

Authors:  Maria Ines De Freitas; Daniel Housley; Abby Caine; Emilie Fauchon; Kerstin Baiker; Davide Corbetta; Giunio B Cherubini
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.333

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.