BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), resection margin status is a significant predictor of survival, particularly in patients with suboptimal response to preoperative therapy. RAS mutations have been linked to more invasive and migratory tumor biology and poor response to modern chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RAS mutation and resection margin status in patients undergoing resection of CLM. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection of CLM from 2005 to 2013 with known RAS mutation status were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A positive margin was defined as tumor cells <1 mm from the parenchymal transection line. RESULTS: The study included 633 patients, of whom 229 (36.2 %) had mutant RAS. The positive margin rate was 11.4 % (26/229) for mutant RAS and 5.4 % (22/404) for wild-type RAS (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with a positive margin were RAS mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.439; p = 0.005) and carcinoembryonic antigen level 4.5 ng/mL or greater (HR 2.060; p = 0.026). Among patients presenting with liver-first recurrence during follow-up, those with mutant RAS had narrower margins at initial CLM resection (median 4 mm vs. 7 mm; p = 0.031). A positive margin (HR 3.360; p < 0.001) and RAS mutation (HR 1.629; p = 0.044) were independently associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: RAS mutations are associated with positive margins in patients undergoing resection of CLM. Tumors with RAS mutation should prompt careful efforts to achieve negative resection margins.
BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), resection margin status is a significant predictor of survival, particularly in patients with suboptimal response to preoperative therapy. RAS mutations have been linked to more invasive and migratory tumor biology and poor response to modern chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RAS mutation and resection margin status in patients undergoing resection of CLM. METHODS:Patients who underwent curative resection of CLM from 2005 to 2013 with known RAS mutation status were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A positive margin was defined as tumor cells <1 mm from the parenchymal transection line. RESULTS: The study included 633 patients, of whom 229 (36.2 %) had mutant RAS. The positive margin rate was 11.4 % (26/229) for mutant RAS and 5.4 % (22/404) for wild-type RAS (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with a positive margin were RAS mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.439; p = 0.005) and carcinoembryonic antigen level 4.5 ng/mL or greater (HR 2.060; p = 0.026). Among patients presenting with liver-first recurrence during follow-up, those with mutant RAS had narrower margins at initial CLM resection (median 4 mm vs. 7 mm; p = 0.031). A positive margin (HR 3.360; p < 0.001) and RAS mutation (HR 1.629; p = 0.044) were independently associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: RAS mutations are associated with positive margins in patients undergoing resection of CLM. Tumors with RAS mutation should prompt careful efforts to achieve negative resection margins.
Authors: J N Vauthey; A Chaoui; K A Do; M M Bilimoria; M J Fenstermacher; C Charnsangavej; M Hicks; G Alsfasser; G Lauwers; I F Hawkins; J Caridi Journal: Surgery Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Chandrakanth Are; Mithat Gonen; Kathleen Zazzali; Ronald P Dematteo; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Scott E Kopetz; Junichi Shindoh; Su S Chen; Andreas Andreou; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Dipen M Maru Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Rafael S Pinheiro; Paulo Herman; Renato M Lupinacci; Quirino Lai; Evandro S Mello; Fabricio F Coelho; Marcos V Perini; Vincenzo Pugliese; Wellington Andraus; Ivan Cecconello; Luiz Carneiro D'Albuquerque Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: J Figueras; F Burdio; E Ramos; J Torras; L Llado; S Lopez-Ben; A Codina-Barreras; S Mojal Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-04-13 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: K S Hughes; R Simon; S Songhorabodi; M A Adson; D M Ilstrup; J G Fortner; B J Maclean; J H Foster; J M Daly; D Fitzherbert Journal: Surgery Date: 1986-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Eran Sadot; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Julie N Leal; Jinru Shia; Mithat Gonen; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; Nancy Kemeny; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin; Michael I DʼAngelica Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Georgios Karagkounis; Michael S Torbenson; Hubert D Daniel; Nilofer S Azad; Luis A Diaz; Ross C Donehower; Kenzo Hirose; Nita Ahuja; Timothy M Pawlik; Michael A Choti Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Zaed Z R Hamady; J Peter A Lodge; Fenella K Welsh; Giles J Toogood; Alan White; Timothy John; Myrddin Rees Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: B C Odisio; S Yamashita; S Y Huang; S Harmoush; S E Kopetz; K Ahrar; Y Shin Chun; C Conrad; T A Aloia; S Gupta; M E Hicks; J-N Vauthey Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Pieter M H Nierop; Diederik J Höppener; Eric P van der Stok; Boris Galjart; Florian E Buisman; Vinod P Balachandran; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Jinru Shia; Peter B Vermeulen; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Paolo Goffredo; Alan F Utria; Anna C Beck; Yun Shin Chun; James R Howe; Ronald J Weigel; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Imran Hassan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jason W Denbo; Suguru Yamashita; Guillaume Passot; Michael Egger; Yun S Chun; Scott E Kopetz; Dipen Maru; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Steven H Wei; Claudius Conrad; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Thomas A Aloia Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 3.452