Literature DB >> 27016227

New pattern-based personalized risk stratification system for endocervical adenocarcinoma with important clinical implications and surgical outcome.

Andres A Roma1, Toni-Ann Mistretta2, Andrea Diaz De Vivar2, Kay J Park3, Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero4, Golnar Rasty5, Jose G Chanona-Vilchis6, Yoshiki Mikami7, Sung R Hong8, Norihiro Teramoto9, Rouba Ali-Fehmi10, Denise Barbuto11, Joanne K L Rutgers11, Elvio G Silva12.   

Abstract

We present a recently introduced three tier pattern-based histopathologic system to stratify endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) that better correlates with lymph node (LN) metastases than FIGO staging alone, and has the advantage of safely predicting node-negative disease in a large proportion of EAC patients. The system consists of stratifying EAC into one of three patterns: pattern A tumors characterized by well-demarcated glands frequently forming clusters or groups with relative lobular architecture and lacking destructive stromal invasion or lymphovascular invasion (LVI), pattern B tumors demonstrating localized destructive invasion (small clusters or individual tumor cells within desmoplastic stroma often arising from pattern A glands), and pattern C tumors with diffusely infiltrative glands and associated desmoplastic response. Three hundred and fifty-two cases were included; mean follow-up 52.8 months. Seventy-three patients (21%) had pattern A tumors; all were stage I and there were no LN metastases or recurrences. Pattern B was seen in 90 tumors (26%); all were stage I and LVI was seen in 24 cases (26.6%). Nodal disease was found in only 4 (4.4%) pattern B tumors (one IA2, two IB1, one IB not further specified (NOS)), each of which showed LVI. Pattern C was found in 189 cases (54%), 117 had LVI (61.9%) and 17% were stage II or greater. Forty-five (23.8%) patients showed LN metastases (one IA1, 14 IB1, 5 IB2, 5 IB NOS, 11 II, 5 III and 4 IV) and recurrences were recorded in 41 (21.7%) patients. This new risk stratification system identifies a subset of stage I patients with essentially no risk of nodal disease, suggesting that patients with pattern A tumors can be spared lymphadenectomy. Patients with pattern B tumors rarely present with LN metastases, and sentinel LN examination could potentially identify these patients. Surgical treatment with nodal resection is justified in patients with pattern C tumors.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification system; Endocervical adenocarcinoma; Invasive carcinoma; Lymph node metastasis; Pattern-based; Risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016227      PMCID: PMC5068220          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  50 in total

1.  Is there a difference in survival for IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix?

Authors:  Harriet O Smith; Clifford R Qualls; Audrey A Romero; Joel C Webb; Maxine H Dorin; Luis A Padilla; Charles R Key
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  A G Ostör
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 3.  Treatment of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Karin C H M Bisseling; Ruud L M Bekkers; Rob M Rome; Michael A Quinn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lilian T Gien; Marie-Claude Beauchemin; Gillian Thomas
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Interobserver variability in the application of a proposed histologic subclassification of endocervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cherie Paquette; Susanne K Jeffus; Charles M Quick; Mark R Conaway; Mark H Stoler; Kristen A Atkins
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 6.  Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  R J Zaino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marek Pluta; Lukas Rob; Martin Charvat; Roman Chmel; Michael Halaska; Petr Skapa; Helena Robova
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  A Baalbergen; P C Ewing-Graham; W C J Hop; P Struijk; Th J M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Symposium part I: adenocarcinoma in situ, glandular dysplasia, and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Richard J Zaino
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Charlotte C Sun; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael T Deavers; Ricardo Dos Reis; Charles F Levenback; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  18 in total

1.  Stromal invasion pattern identifies patients at lowest risk of lymph node metastasis in HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinomas, but is irrelevant in adenocarcinomas unassociated with HPV.

Authors:  S Stolnicu; I Barsan; L Hoang; P Patel; C Terinte; A Pesci; S Aviel-Ronen; T Kiyokawa; I Alvarado-Cabrero; E Oliva; K J Park; N R Abu-Rustum; M C Pike; R A Soslow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  The pattern is the issue: recent advances in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Andres A Roma; Oluwole Fadare
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  The central role of the pathologist in the management of patients with cervical cancer: ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Sigurd F Lax; W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Miniseries of reviews: gynecological pathology.

Authors:  Sigurd F Lax
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  A guided tour of selected issues pertaining to metastatic carcinomas involving or originating from the gynecologic tract.

Authors:  Robert A Soslow; Rajmohan Murali
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 6.  [Categorization of uterine cervix tumors : What's new in the 2014 WHO classification].

Authors:  S F Lax; L-C Horn; T Löning
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  [Cervical cancer : Update on morphology].

Authors:  L-C Horn; C E Brambs; R Handzel; S Lax; I Sändig; D Schmidt; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  [Current WHO classification of the female genitals : Many new things, but also some old].

Authors:  Doris Mayr; Elisa Schmoeckel; Anne Kathrin Höhn; Grit Gesine Ruth Hiller; Lars-Christian Horn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Clinical, Morphologic, and Molecular Features Associated With Ovarian Metastases From Pattern A Endocervical Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Jacqueline Feinberg; Anjelica Hodgson; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Kara Long Roche; Kay J Park
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  [Revised German guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix-what's new for pathologists in 2021?]

Authors:  Lars-Christian Horn; Matthias W Beckmann; Markus Follmann; Martin C Koch; Monika Nothacker; Birgit Pöschel; Frederik Stübs; Dietmar Schmidt; Anne Kathrin Höhn
Journal:  Pathologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.