Literature DB >> 27015753

A percutaneous reduction technique for irreducible and difficult variant of paediatric distal radius and ulna fractures.

Wei Huang1, Xu Zhang2, Hongwei Zhu3, Xianhui Wang3, Jianxin Sun3, Xinzhong Shao4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The objective of this study is to introduce a novel percutaneous reduction technique for irreducible and difficult paediatric radius and ulna fractures in the distal forearm.
METHODS: From May 2010 to January 2012, the percutaneous joystick technique was conducted in 48 children who sustained irreducible or difficult radius and ulna fractures in the distal forearm. The series comprises 32 male and 16 female patients with an average age of 11 years (range, 7-15 years). Among them, 22 patients were <9 years of age. At the final follow-up, the range of motion of the wrist and grip strength of the hand were assessed. Measurements were compared to those on the opposite side. Wrist function was assessed with Mayo Wrist Score. Appearance and patient satisfaction were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Bone healing was achieved in all patients (radius: mean 3.5 weeks, range, 3-4 weeks; ulna: 3.8 weeks, range, 3-4 weeks), respectively. After an average follow-up period of 39 months (range, 36-45 months), patients had an average range of wrist motion of 74° (range, 65-86°) in flexion and 64° (range, 54-78°) in extension. The mean grip strength of the injured side was 33.7kg (13.8-47.6kg). The mean Mayo Wrist Score was 97 (range, 85-100), including 44 excellent and four good results. The mean scores of appearance and patient satisfaction on the forearm were 9.7 (range, 9-10) and 9.8 (range, 8-10), respectively. No significant difference was found regarding the range of motion and grip strength (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous reduction technique is a safe and valuable procedure for irreducible and difficult paediatric fractures of distal radius and ulna.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal radius and ulna; K-wire; Paediatric fracture; Pin; Reduction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27015753     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of operating time, fluoroscopy exposure time, and functional and radiological results of two surgical methods for distal forearm fractures of both-bones in pediatric patients: Is it necessary to fix both bones?

Authors:  Hakan Kocaoğlu; Mahmut Kalem; Mustafa Kavak; Ercan Şahin; Kerem Başarır; Hakan Kınık
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 2.  Developing a core outcome set for paediatric wrist fractures: a systematic review of prior outcomes.

Authors:  Benjamin Thomas Crosby; Abolfazl Behbahani; Olivia Olujohungbe; Ben Cottam; Daniel Perry
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  Management of an Open Distal Radius Epiphysiolysis in a 14-year-old Male: A Case Report.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Mastrantonakis; Charalampos A Christogiannis; Themistoklis V Tragaris; Anastasia K Garmpi; Emmanouil I Daskalogiannakis
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020

4.  Palmar approach with Kirschner-wire fixation in the treatment of children's distal radius extension type fracture.

Authors:  Zu-Jie Hu; Ming Li; Xing Liu; Chuan-Kang Liu
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2018-10-04

Review 5.  Is percutaneous pinning needed for the treatment of displaced distal radius metaphyseal fractures in children?: A systematic review.

Authors:  Zhi-Kui Zeng; Wei-Dong Liang; You-Qiang Sun; Ping-Pin Jiang; Ding Li; Zhen Shen; Ling-Mei Yuan; Feng Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.