Literature DB >> 27015516

Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations.

Simon J Allen1,2, Kate A Bryant3, Robert H S Kraus4,5, Neil R Loneragan3, Anna M Kopps6,7, Alexander M Brown1, Livia Gerber6, Michael Krützen6.   

Abstract

The identification of species and population boundaries is important in both evolutionary and conservation biology. In recent years, new population genetic and computational methods for estimating population parameters and testing hypotheses in a quantitative manner have emerged. Using a Bayesian framework and a quantitative model-testing approach, we evaluated the species status and genetic connectedness of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations off remote northwestern Australia, with a focus on pelagic 'offshore' dolphins subject to incidental capture in a trawl fishery. We analysed 71 dolphin samples from three sites beyond the 50 m depth contour (the inshore boundary of the fishery) and up to 170 km offshore, including incidentally caught and free-ranging individuals associating with trawl vessels, and 273 dolphins sampled at 12 coastal sites inshore of the 50 m depth contour and within 10 km of the coast. Results from 19 nuclear microsatellite markers showed significant population structure between dolphins from within the fishery and coastal sites, but also among dolphins from coastal sites, identifying three coastal populations. Moreover, we found no current or historic gene flow into the offshore population in the region of the fishery, indicating a complete lack of recruitment from coastal sites. Mitochondrial DNA corroborated our findings of genetic isolation between dolphins from the offshore population and coastal sites. Most offshore individuals formed a monophyletic clade with common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), while all 273 individuals sampled coastally formed a well-supported clade of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus). By including a quantitative modelling approach, our study explicitly took evolutionary processes into account for informing the conservation and management of protected species. As such, it may serve as a template for other, similarly inaccessible study populations.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bycatch; delphinids; gene flow; migration; population structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27015516     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  11 in total

1.  Acoustic coordination by allied male dolphins in a cooperative context.

Authors:  Bronte L Moore; Richard C Connor; Simon J Allen; Michael Krützen; Stephanie L King
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  High genetic structure and low mitochondrial diversity in bottlenose dolphins of the Archipelago of Bocas del Toro, Panama: A population at risk?

Authors:  Dalia C Barragán-Barrera; Laura J May-Collado; Gabriela Tezanos-Pinto; Valentina Islas-Villanueva; Camilo A Correa-Cárdenas; Susana Caballero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Population genetic structure of Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis) from the southwestern Atlantic coast of Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Ywasaki Lima; Filipe Brum Machado; Ana Paula Cazerta Farro; Lupércio de Araújo Barbosa; Leonardo Serafim da Silveira; Enrique Medina-Acosta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Preliminary estimates of the abundance and fidelity of dolphins associating with a demersal trawl fishery.

Authors:  Simon J Allen; Kenneth H Pollock; Phil J Bouchet; Halina T Kobryn; Deirdre B McElligott; Krista E Nicholson; Joshua N Smith; Neil R Loneragan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Low mtDNA diversity in a highly differentiated population of spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris) from the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Brazil.

Authors:  Drienne Messa Faria; José Martins da Silva; Leonora Pires Costa; Samuel Rezende Paiva; Celso Luis Marino; Mario Manoel Rollo; C Scott Baker; Ana Paula Cazerta Farro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cooperation-based concept formation in male bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Stephanie L King; Richard C Connor; Michael Krützen; Simon J Allen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Strategic intergroup alliances increase access to a contested resource in male bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Richard C Connor; Michael Krützen; Simon J Allen; William B Sherwin; Stephanie L King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Multi-modal sexual displays in Australian humpback dolphins.

Authors:  S J Allen; S L King; M Krützen; A M Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Hybridization in bottlenose dolphins-A case study of Tursiops aduncus × T. truncatus hybrids and successful backcross hybridization events.

Authors:  T Gridley; S H Elwen; G Harris; D M Moore; A R Hoelzel; F Lampen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantifying dispersal between marine protected areas by a highly mobile species, the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus.

Authors:  Milaja Nykänen; Eileen Dillane; Anneli Englund; Andrew D Foote; Simon N Ingram; Marie Louis; Luca Mirimin; Machiel Oudejans; Emer Rogan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.