Literature DB >> 27015402

Quality of life in patients with intracranial tumors: does tumor laterality matter?

Christina Drewes1, Lisa Millgård Sagberg2,3, Asgeir Store Jakola2,4,5, Ole Solheim2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Traditionally, the dominant (usually left) cerebral hemisphere is regarded as the more important one, and everyday clinical decisions are influenced by this view. However, reported results on the impact of lesion laterality are inconsistent in the scarce literature on quality of life (QOL) in patients with brain tumors. The authors aimed to study which cerebral hemisphere is the most important to patients with intracranial tumors with respect to health-related QOL (HRQOL). METHODS Two hundred forty-eight patients with unilateral, unifocal gliomas or meningiomas scheduled for primary surgery were included in this prospective cohort study. Generic HRQOL was measured using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire preoperatively and after 4-6 weeks. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of data were performed. RESULTS Tumor volumes were significantly larger in right-sided tumors at diagnosis, and language or speech problems were more common in left-sided lesions. Otherwise, no differences existed in baseline data. The median EQ-5D-3L index was 0.73 (range -0.24 to 1.00) in patients with right-sided tumors and 0.76 (range -0.48 to 1.00) in patients with left-sided tumors (p = 0.709). Due to the difference in tumor volumes at baseline, histopathology and tumor volumes were matched in 198 patients. EQ-5D-3L index scores in this 1:1 matched analysis were 0.74 (range -0.7 to 1.00) for patients with right-sided and 0.76 (range -0.48 to 1.00) for left-sided lesions (p = 0.342). In the analysis of longitudinal data, no association was found between tumor laterality and postoperative EQ-5D-3L index scores (p = 0.957) or clinically significant change in HRQOL following surgery (p = 0.793). CONCLUSIONS In an overall patient-reported QOL perspective, tumor laterality does not appear to be of significant importance for generic HRQOL in patients with intracranial tumors. This may imply that right-sided cerebral functions are underestimated by clinicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; HRQOL = health-related QOL; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; QOL = quality of life; VAS = visual analog scale; brain neoplasm; laterality; oncology; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27015402     DOI: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS152252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  The patients' view: impact of the extent of resection, intraoperative imaging, and awake surgery on health-related quality of life in high-grade glioma patients-results of a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katrin Nickel; Mirjam Renovanz; Jochem König; Linda Stöckelmaier; Anne-Katrin Hickmann; Minou Nadji-Ohl; Jens Engelke; Elke Weimann; Dirk Freudenstein; Oliver Ganslandt; Lars Bullinger; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Jan Coburger
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Awake surgery for right frontal lobe glioma can preserve visuospatial cognition and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Mitsutoshi Nakada; Riho Nakajima; Hirokazu Okita; Yusuke Nakade; Takeo Yuno; Shingo Tanaka; Masashi Kinoshita
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Elevated Serum Lactate in Glioma Patients: Associated Factors.

Authors:  Beathe Sitter; Annamaria Forsmark; Ole Solheim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Is there a response shift in generic health-related quality of life 6 months after glioma surgery?

Authors:  Asgeir Store Jakola; Ole Solheim; Sasha Gulati; Lisa Millgård Sagberg
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Effects of Chronic Brain Injury on Quality of Life: A Study in Patients With Left- or Right-Sided Lesion.

Authors:  Madhushree Chakrabarty; Eliza M Pflieger; Eileen Cardillo; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2019-11-01

Review 6.  A systematic review of the use of subcortical intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping for monitoring of executive deficits and neglect: what is the evidence so far?

Authors:  Maud J F Landers; Margriet M Sitskoorn; Geert-Jan M Rutten; Emmanuel Mandonnet; Wouter De Baene
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Quality of life and return to work and sports after spinal ependymoma resection.

Authors:  Vicki M Butenschoen; Till Gloßner; Isabel C Hostettler; Bernhard Meyer; Maria Wostrack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.