Literature DB >> 27015340

A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications for Plastic Surgery Providers: Target Audience, Uses, and Cost.

Ryan Reusche1, Patrick J Buchanan, Jeffrey H Kozlow, Christian J Vercler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growth and acceptance of smartphones among clinicians has been remarkable over the last decade. Over 87% of doctors use a smartphone or tablet capable of running third-party software known as applications (apps). In the field of plastic surgery, apps have been designed for personal practice development, education, clinical tools and guidelines, and entertainment. This study reviews the literature on apps related to plastic surgery and determines the number and types of apps available.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to find articles written about plastic surgery applications. Queries were run in the Apple iPhone iOS App store and Google Play using the term "plastic surgery." Apps were reviewed for ratings, downloads, and cost. In addition, apps were categorized based on purpose. Categories include practice development, media/literature, clinical tool and guideline apps, or recreation.
RESULTS: The literature search yielded 8 articles for review, 2 articles focused on categorizing apps and 6 articles focused on describing useful apps. Searching Apple's iTunes (iOS) store identified 273 and Google Play identified 250 apps related to plastic surgery; since 2013, a 62%, and 580% increase, respectively. The iOS store included practice development (46%), recreation (26%), media/literature (14%), and clinical tool and guideline (11%). Google Play store included recreation apps (44%), practice development (24%), clinical tools and guidelines (11%), and media and literature (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Apps related to the field of plastic surgery are increasing in prevalence. The content of these apps are variable, and the majority are intended for marketing and development of private practices. Apps linking to literature, texts, study materials, and clinical tools and guidelines are developed for both practicing plastic surgeons and surgical trainees. Finding "useful" apps takes time because searches are often complicated by a variety of apps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27015340     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  4 in total

1.  Smartphone applications (apps) in general surgical practice: An insight into their reliability and usefulness.

Authors:  Aishwarya Sinha; Washim Firoz Khan; Shardool Vikram Gupta; Pankaj Agrawal
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

2.  Avoiding Breach of Patient Confidentiality: Trial of a Smartphone Application That Enables Secure Clinical Photography and Communication.

Authors:  Danielle O Dumestre; Frankie Fraulin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Balancing the Need for Clinical Photography With Patient Privacy Issues: The Search for a Secure SmartPhone Application to Take and Store Clinical Photographs.

Authors:  Danielle O Dumestre; Frankie O G Fraulin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  SPOTting Eyelid Injuries: A Novel Mobile Application for Managing Periocular Injuries.

Authors:  Devi Prasad Mohapatra; Ravi Kumar Chittoria; Meethale Thiruvoth; Likhitha Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2019-11-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.