Literature DB >> 27015033

Comparing the Prognostic Value of BAP1 Mutation Pattern, Chromosome 3 Status, and BAP1 Immunohistochemistry in Uveal Melanoma.

Johannes A P van de Nes1, Jasmin Nelles, Stefan Kreis, Claudia H D Metz, Thomas Hager, Dietmar R Lohmann, Michael Zeschnigk.   

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM), a tumor of the eye, can be divided into 2 major classes correlating with patients' prognosis. Gene expression profiles and chromosome 3 status are correlated with tumor classification and prognosis. Somatic BAP1 mutations are another feature largely restricted to metastatic UM. Here we performed thorough BAP1 mutation analysis including sequencing and gene dosage analysis of all BAP1 coding exons as well as methylation analysis of the promoter CpG island in a set of 66 UMs. The results were compared with the BAP1 protein expression as determined by immunohistochemistry and the tumor-related survival of the patients. BAP1 sequencing and gene dosage analysis of BAP1 exons by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification revealed a mutation in 33 (89%) of 37 tumors with monosomy 3 (M3) or isodisomy 3. BAP1 mutations were not detected in any of the 28 tumors with disomy 3 or partial monosomy 3 (partM3). Most of the sequence mutations (21 of 28) were frame-shift, splice-site, or nonsense mutations leading to a premature termination codon. BAP1 protein as determined by immunohistochemistry was absent in all samples with a BAP1 mutation irrespective of the functional type of mutation. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a highly significant association between BAP1 protein staining and patients' survival (P=0.0004). The association between BAP1 mutation status and tumor-related survival was less pronounced but still significant (P=0.0023). We conclude that BAP1 protein staining is favorable over BAP1 mutation screening by Sanger sequencing for prognostic testing of UM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27015033     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  31 in total

1.  SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations in blue nevus-like melanoma.

Authors:  Klaus G Griewank; Hansgeorg Müller; Louise A Jackett; Michael Emberger; Inga Möller; Johannes Ap van de Nes; Lisa Zimmer; Elisabeth Livingstone; Thomas Wiesner; Simone L Scholz; Ioana Cosgarea; Antje Sucker; Tobias Schimming; Uwe Hillen; Bastian Schilling; Annette Paschen; Henning Reis; Thomas Mentzel; Heinz Kutzner; Arno Rütten; Rajmohan Murali; Richard A Scolyer; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  BAP1 Immunostaining in Uveal Melanoma: Potentials and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Martina C Herwig-Carl; Amit Sharma; Alexandre Moulin; Claudine Strack; Karin U Loeffler
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2018-02-13

3.  Uveal Melanoma Nuclear BRCA1-Associated Protein-1 Immunoreactivity Is an Indicator of Metastasis.

Authors:  Eszter Szalai; Jill R Wells; Laura Ward; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  BAP1 mutations in high-grade meningioma: implications for patient care.

Authors:  Ganesh M Shankar; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  BAP1 Loss Is Associated with DNA Methylomic Repatterning in Highly Aggressive Class 2 Uveal Melanomas.

Authors:  Matthew G Field; Jeffim N Kuznetsov; Parker L Bussies; Louie Z Cai; Karam A Alawa; Christina L Decatur; Stefan Kurtenbach; J William Harbour
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Correlation of Immunocytochemistry of BRCA1-associated Protein-1 (BAP1) With Other Prognostic Markers in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Ben J Glasgow; Tara A McCannel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Combined mutation and copy-number variation detection by targeted next-generation sequencing in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Kyra N Smit; Natasha M van Poppelen; Jolanda Vaarwater; Robert Verdijk; Ronald van Marion; Helen Kalirai; Sarah E Coupland; Sophie Thornton; Neil Farquhar; Hendrikus-Jan Dubbink; Dion Paridaens; Annelies de Klein; Emine Kiliç
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Prognostic significance of BAP1 expression in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Ahmet M Aydin; Nirmish Singla; Vandana Panwar; Solomon L Woldu; Yuval Freifeld; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam; Alon Z Weizer; Jay D Raman; Mesut Remzi; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Andrea Haitel; Marco Roscigno; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Mary E Westerman; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat; Yair Lotan; Aditya Bagrodia; Payal Kapur; Vitaly Margulis; Laura-Maria Krabbe
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Loss of BAP1 in Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas Seems Unrelated to Genetic Mutations.

Authors:  Valeria Maffeis; Rocco Cappellesso; Lorenzo Nicolè; Vincenza Guzzardo; Chiara Menin; Lisa Elefanti; Francesca Schiavi; Maria Guido; Ambrogio Fassina
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.943

10.  Germline and somatic BAP1 mutations in high-grade rhabdoid meningiomas.

Authors:  Ganesh M Shankar; Malak Abedalthagafi; Rachael A Vaubel; Parker H Merrill; Naema Nayyar; Corey M Gill; Ryan Brewster; Wenya Linda Bi; Pankaj K Agarwalla; Aaron R Thorner; David A Reardon; Ossama Al-Mefty; Patrick Y Wen; Brian M Alexander; Paul van Hummelen; Tracy T Batchelor; Keith L Ligon; Azra H Ligon; Matthew Meyerson; Ian F Dunn; Rameen Beroukhim; David N Louis; Arie Perry; Scott L Carter; Caterina Giannini; William T Curry; Daniel P Cahill; Frederick G Barker; Priscilla K Brastianos; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.