Literature DB >> 27013314

The UN Commission on Life Saving Commodities 3 years on: global progress update and results of a multicountry assessment.

Paul M Pronyk1, Bennett Nemser2, Blerta Maliqi3, Nora Springstubb2, Diana Sera2, Rouslan Karimov2, Elizabeth Katwan4, Benedicte Walter2, Pascal Bijleveld2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In September, 2012, the UN Commission on Life Saving Commodities (UNCoLSC) outlined a plan to expand availability and access to 13 life saving commodities. We profile global and country progress against these recommendations between 2012 and 2015.
METHODS: For 12 countries in sub-Saharan Africa that were off-track to achieve the Millennium Development Goals for maternal and child survival, we reviewed key documents and reference data, and conducted interviews with ministry staff and partners to assess the status of the UNCoLSC recommendations. The RMNCH fund provided short-term catalytic financing to support country plans to advance the commodity agenda, with activities coded by UNCoLSC recommendation. Our network of technical resource teams identified, addressed, and monitored progress against cross-cutting commodity-related challenges that needed coordinated global action.
FINDINGS: In 2014 and 2015, child and maternal health commodities had fewer bottlenecks than reproductive and neonatal commodities. Common bottlenecks included regulatory challenges (ten of 12 countries); poor quality assurance (11 of 12 countries); insufficient staff training (more than half of facilities on average); and weak supply chains systems (11 of 12 countries), with stock-outs of priority commodities in about 40% of facilities on average. The RMNCH fund committed US$175·7 million to 19 countries to support strategies addressing crucial gaps. $68·2 million (39·0%) of the funds supported systems-strengthening interventions with the remainder split across reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. Health worker training ($88·6 million, 50·4%), supply chain ($53·3 million, 30·0%), and demand generation ($21·1 million, 12·0%) were the major topics of focus. All priority commodities are now listed in the WHO Essential Medicines List; appropriate price reductions were secured; quality manufacturing was improved; a fast-track registration mechanism for prequalified products was established; and methods were developed for advocacy, quantification, demand generation, supply chain, and provider training. Slower progress was evident around regulatory harmonisation and quality assurance.
INTERPRETATION: Much work is needed to achieve full implementation of the UNCoLSC recommendations. Coordinated efforts to secure price reductions beyond the 13 commodities and improve regulatory efficiency, quality, and supply chains are still needed alongside broader dissemination of work products. FUNDING: Governments of Norway (NORAD) and the UK (DFID).
Copyright © 2015 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published without any waiver of WHO's privileges and immunities under international law, convention, or agreement. This Article should not be reproduced for use in association with the promotion of commercial products, services, or any legal entity. There should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the Article's original URL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013314     DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)00046-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-109X            Impact factor:   26.763


  20 in total

1.  Assessment of Inventory Management Practice and Associated Challenges of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Life-Saving Drugs in Public Hospitals of Southwest Ethiopia: A Mixed-Method Approach.

Authors:  Azmeraw Bekele; Wondwosen Kumsa; Mihret Ayalew
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  Stock-outs of essential medicines among community health workers (CHWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic literature review of the extent, reasons, and consequences.

Authors:  Abimbola Olaniran; Jane Briggs; Ami Pradhan; Erin Bogue; Benjamin Schreiber; Hannah Sarah Dini; Hitesh Hurkchand; Madeleine Ballard
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Availability and affordability of priority lifesaving maternal health medicines in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Fantaye Teka Dinkashe; Kinfe Haile; Fatimetu Mohammed Adem
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Process evaluation of knowledge transfer across industries: Leveraging Coca-Cola's supply chain expertise for medicine availability in Tanzania.

Authors:  Erika Linnander; Christina T Yuan; Shirin Ahmed; Emily Cherlin; Kristina Talbert-Slagle; Leslie A Curry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Out-of-pocket payment for surgery in Uganda: The rate of impoverishing and catastrophic expenditure at a government hospital.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Anderson; Lenka Ilcisin; Peter Kayima; Lenard Abesiga; Noralis Portal Benitez; Joseph Ngonzi; Mayanja Ronald; Mark G Shrime
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Availability, prices and affordability of UN Commission's lifesaving medicines for reproductive and maternal health in Uganda.

Authors:  Denis Kibira; Freddy Eric Kitutu; Gemma Buckland Merrett; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2017-11-15

7.  Persisting demand and supply gap for maternal and newborn care in eastern Uganda: a mixed-method cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rornald Muhumuza Kananura; Suzanne Namusoke Kiwanuka; Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho; Peter Waiswa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Effective Collaboration for Scaling Up Health Technologies: A Case Study of the Chlorhexidine for Umbilical Cord Care Experience.

Authors:  Patricia S Coffey; Steve Hodgins; Amie Bishop
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-03-30

9.  Assessing capacity of health facilities to provide routine maternal and newborn care in low-income settings: what proportions are ready to provide good-quality care, and what proportions of women receive it?

Authors:  Keith Tomlin; Della Berhanu; Meenakshi Gautham; Nasir Umar; Joanna Schellenberg; Deepthi Wickremasinghe; Tanya Marchant
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Provision of medical supply kits to improve quality of antenatal care in Mozambique: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Eduardo Bergel; Sally Griffin; Armando Melo; My Huong Nguyen; Alicia Carbonell; Santos Mondlane; Mario Merialdi; Marleen Temmerman; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 26.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.