Literature DB >> 27013290

Personal and professional use of menopausal hormone therapy among gynecologists: A multinational study (REDLINC VII).

Luis Danckers1, Juan E Blümel2, Silvina Witis1, María S Vallejo1, Konstantino Tserotas1, Hugo Sánchez1, Carlos Salinas1, Javier Saavedra1, José A Rojas1, William Onatra1, Eliana Ojeda1, Desireé Mostajo1, Flory Morera1, Alvaro Monterrosa1, Armando Montaño1, Nelva Meruvia1, Mabel Martino1, Jaime Martínez1, Selva Lima1, Erik González1, Gustavo Gómez1, María T Espinoza1, Olivia Castillo1, Blanca Campostrini1, Andrés Calle1, Gerardo Broutin1, Ascanio Bencosme1, Eugenio Arteaga1, Félix Ayala1, Peter Chedraui3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously, the REDLINC VI study showed that the main reason for the low use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) was its low rate of prescription by doctors.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the use of MHT and perceived related risks among gynecologists.
METHODS: A self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was delivered to certified gynecologists in 11 Latin American countries.
RESULTS: A total of 2154 gynecologists were contacted, of whom 85.3% responded to the survey (n = 1837). Mean age was 48.1 ± 11.4 years; 55.5% were male, 20.3% were faculty members and 85% had a partner. Overall, 85.4% of gynecologists responded that they would use MHT if they had menopausal symptoms (81.8% in the case of female gynecologists) or prescribe it to their partner (88.2% in the case of male gynecologists; p < 0.001). Perceived risk related to MHT use (on a scale from 0 to 10) was higher among female than among male gynecologists (4.06 ± 2.09 vs. 3.83 ± 2.11, p < 0.02). The top two perceived reported risks were thromboembolism (women 33.6% vs. men 41.4%, p < 0.009) and breast cancer (women 38.5% vs. men 33.9%, p < 0.03). Overall, gynecologists reported prescribing MHT to 48.9% of their symptomatic patients (women 47.3% vs. men 50.2%, p < 0.03) and 86.8% currently prescribed non-hormonal remedies and 83.8% alternative therapies for the management of the menopause. Gynecologists who were older and academic professionals prescribed MHT more often.
CONCLUSION: Although this Latin American survey showed that gynecologists are mostly supporters of MHT use (for themselves or their partners), this is not necessarily reflected in their clinical practice.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecologists; Menopausal hormone therapy; Personal use; Prescribing behavior; Professionals

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013290     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  3 in total

1.  What is behind the fear of cancer during menopausal hormone therapy in China?

Authors:  Yanfang Wang; Wei Wang; Ying Feng; Zhangyun Tan; Xiaomin Yang; Danhong Peng; Yinqing Zhao; Han Dong; Qingmei Zheng; Xiaoqin Zeng; Ying Zou; Aijun Sun
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  Menopause in Latin America: Symptoms, attitudes, treatments and future directions in Costa Rica.

Authors:  T D Locklear; B J Doyle; A L Perez; S M Wicks; G B Mahady
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Efficacy of menopausal hormone therapy on sleep quality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dahima Cintron; Melissa Lipford; Laura Larrea-Mantilla; Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla; Robin Lloyd; Michael R Gionfriddo; Shalak Gunjal; Ann M Farrell; Virginia M Miller; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.633

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.