Literature DB >> 27013278

Establishing Benchmarks For Minimum Competence With Dry Lab Robotic Surgery Drills.

Nazema Y Siddiqui1, Megan E Tarr2, Elizabeth J Geller3, Arnold P Advincula4, Michael L Galloway5, Isabel C Green6, Hye-Chun Hur7, Michael C Pitter4, Emily E Burke8, Martin A Martino9.   

Abstract

The Robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (R-OSATS) is a previously validated assessment tool that is used to assess 5 standardized inanimate robotic surgery drills. R-OSATS is used to evaluate performance on surgical drills, with scores of 0 to 20 for each drill. Our objective was to establish the minimum threshold score that denotes competence on these drills. Thus, we performed a standard setting study using data from surgeons and trainees in 8 academic medical centers. Cutoff scores for the minimal level of competence using R-OSATS were established using 2 techniques: the modified Angoff and the contrasting groups methods. For the modified Angoff method, 8 content experts met and, in an iterative process, derived the scores that a minimally competent trainee should receive. After 2 iterative rounds of scoring and discussion with the modified Angoff method, we established a minimum competence score per drill with high agreement (rWG range, 0.92-0.98). There was unanimous consensus that a trainee needs to achieve competence on each independent drill. A second method, the contrasting groups method, was used to verify our results. In this method, we compared R-OSATS scores from "inexperienced" (34 postgraduate year 1 and 2 trainees) with "experienced" (22 faculty and fellow) robotic surgeons. The distributions of scores from both groups were plotted, and a cutoff score for each drill was determined from the intersection of the 2 curves. Using this method, the minimum score for competence would be 14 per drill, which is slightly more stringent but confirms the results obtained from the modified Angoff approach. In conclusion, using 2 well-described standard setting techniques, we have established minimum benchmarks designating trainee competence for 5 dry lab robotic surgery drills.
Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills; Robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Surgical education; Technical skills

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013278     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  3 in total

Review 1.  Objective assessment of robotic surgical skills: review of literature and future directions.

Authors:  Saratu Kutana; Daniel P Bitner; Poppy Addison; Paul J Chung; Mark A Talamini; Filippo Filicori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Benchmarking the American Society of Breast Surgeon Member Performance for More Than a Million Quality Measure-Patient Encounters.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Lisa Bailey; Tiffany S Berry; Andrew J Borgert; Robert Buras; Steven L Chen; Amy C Degnim; Joshua Froman; Jennifer Gass; Caprice Greenberg; Starr Koslow Mautner; Helen Krontiras; Luis D Ramirez; Michelle Sowden; Barbara Wexelman; Lee Wilke; Roshni Rao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Training in Robotic Surgery-an Overview.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Tim P Briggs; John D Kelly; Senthil Nathan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.