Literature DB >> 27013261

Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data.

Heiko H Schütt1, Stefan Harmeling2, Jakob H Macke3, Felix A Wichmann4.   

Abstract

The psychometric function describes how an experimental variable, such as stimulus strength, influences the behaviour of an observer. Estimation of psychometric functions from experimental data plays a central role in fields such as psychophysics, experimental psychology and in the behavioural neurosciences. Experimental data may exhibit substantial overdispersion, which may result from non-stationarity in the behaviour of observers. Here we extend the standard binomial model which is typically used for psychometric function estimation to a beta-binomial model. We show that the use of the beta-binomial model makes it possible to determine accurate credible intervals even in data which exhibit substantial overdispersion. This goes beyond classical measures for overdispersion-goodness-of-fit-which can detect overdispersion but provide no method to do correct inference for overdispersed data. We use Bayesian inference methods for estimating the posterior distribution of the parameters of the psychometric function. Unlike previous Bayesian psychometric inference methods our software implementation-psignifit 4-performs numerical integration of the posterior within automatically determined bounds. This avoids the use of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods typically requiring expert knowledge. Extensive numerical tests show the validity of the approach and we discuss implications of overdispersion for experimental design. A comprehensive MATLAB toolbox implementing the method is freely available; a python implementation providing the basic capabilities is also available.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Beta-binomial model; Confidence intervals; Credible intervals; Non-stationarity; Overdispersion; Psychometric function; Psychophysical methods

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013261     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  73 in total

1.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural Variability Limits Adolescent Skill Learning.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Statistical approaches to identifying lapses in psychometric response data.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-06

4.  Heading perception depends on time-varying evolution of optic flow.

Authors:  Charlie S Burlingham; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Adaptive stimulus selection for multi-alternative psychometric functions with lapses.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Bak; Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Parietal Cortex Is Required for the Integration of Acoustic Evidence.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Justin Gimoto; Christine M Constantinople; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Slowing the body slows down time perception.

Authors:  Rose De Kock; Weiwei Zhou; Wilsaan M Joiner; Martin Wiener
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Temporal Encoding is Required for Categorization, But Not Discrimination.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Interrater Reliability for a Two-Interval, Observer-Based Procedure for Measuring Hearing in Young Children.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Ashton Wiens; Emily C Nightengale; Eric A Vance
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.