Literature DB >> 27013232

Medicare expenditures for elderly patients undergoing surgical clipping or endovascular intervention for unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Kimon Bekelis1,2, Dan Gottlieb2, Yin Su2, Nicos Labropoulos3, George Bovis4, Michael T Lawton5, Todd A MacKenzie6,7,8,2,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cost difference between the two treatment options (surgical clipping and endovascular therapy) for unruptured cerebral aneurysms remains an issue of debate. We investigated the association between treatment method for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and Medicare expenditures in elderly patients.
METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms from 2007 to 2012. In order to control for measured confounding we used multivariable regression analysis with mixed effects to account for clustering at the Hospital Referral Region (HRR) level. An instrumental variable (regional rates of endovascular treatment) analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding by creating pseudo-randomization on the treatment method.
RESULTS: During the study period 8705 patients underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2585 (29.7%) had surgical clipping and 6120 (70.3%) had endovascular treatment. The median total Medicare expenditures in the first year after the admission for the procedure were $46 800 (IQR $31 000-$74 400) for surgical clipping and $48 100 (IQR $34 500-$73 900) for endovascular therapy. When we adjusted for unmeasured confounders, using an instrumental variable analysis, clipping was associated with increased 7-day Medicare expenditures by $3527 (95% CI $972 to $5736) and increased 1-year Medicare expenditures by $15 984 (95% CI $9017 to $22 951).
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of Medicare patients, after controlling for unmeasured confounding, we demonstrated that surgical clipping of unruptured cerebral aneurysms was associated with increased 1-year expenditures compared with endovascular treatment. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Coil

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013232      PMCID: PMC5035560          DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  29 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Jonathan L Brisman; Joon K Song; David W Newell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Uncertainty and agreement in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Tim E Darsaut; Laurent Estrade; Sara Jamali; Michel W Bojanowski; Miguel Chagnon; Jean Raymond
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Effect of age on outcomes of treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001-2008.

Authors:  Waleed Brinjikji; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Giuseppe Lanzino; David F Kallmes; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Impact of International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. Clinical article.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Gabriela Vazquez; Nauman Tariq; M Fareed K Suri; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Safety and occlusion rates of surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1990 to 2011.

Authors:  Marc Kotowski; Olivier Naggara; Tim E Darsaut; Suzanne Nolet; Guylaine Gevry; Evgueni Kouznetsov; Jean Raymond
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Comparative effectiveness of unruptured cerebral aneurysm therapies: propensity score analysis of clipping versus coiling.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Jiaquan Fan; David F Kallmes; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Treatment pathways, resource use, and costs of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping after aSAH.

Authors:  Jane Wolstenholme; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Alastair Gray; Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Julia A Yarnold; Mary Sneade
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Comparative Cost Analysis for Surgical and Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in South Korea.

Authors:  Myungsoo Kim; Jaechan Park; Joomi Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-06-30

9.  New York State: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Using an Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Shannon Coy; Robert J Singer; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Clinical outcomes of treatment for intracranial aneurysm in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jun Hee Park; Young Im Kim; Yong Cheol Lim
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2014-09-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-dimensional aneurysm volume measurements show no correlation between coil packing density and recurrence.

Authors:  Bart Thaci; Miriam Nuño; Kunal Varshneya; Clayton H Gerndt; Matthew Kercher; Brian C Dahlin; Ben Waldau
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-10-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.