Literature DB >> 27013032

Differences in mRNA populations of short and long bovine conceptuses on Day 15 of gestation.

Callie V Barnwell1, Peter W Farin1, Christopher M Ashwell1, William T Farmer1, Samuel P Galphin1, Charlotte E Farin1.   

Abstract

The majority of pregnancy loss in cattle occurs between Days 8 and 16 of gestation, coincident with the initiation of conceptus elongation and the onset of maternal recognition of pregnancy. Differences in conceptus length on the same day of gestation may be related to an inherent lack of developmental competency or may simply be a consequence of asynchrony with the maternal environment. The objective of this work was to characterize differential patterns of mRNA expression between short and long bovine conceptuses recovered on Day 15 of gestation. Embryos were produced from super-ovulated Holstein donor cows, and groups of Grade-1 and Grade-3 compact morulas were transferred into recipient heifers at Day 6.5 of their cycle. Conceptuses were recovered at Day 15 of gestation, and measured to assess overall length and area. Total RNA was extracted and analyzed on individual GeneChip Bovine Genome Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Gene expression was compared between conceptuses derived from the transfer of Grade-1 versus Grade-3 embryos; no differences were identified in the profiles of Day-15 conceptuses of these different embryo grades. When gene expression was compared between conceptuses classified as either short (mean length of 4.2 ± 0.1 mm [standard error]) or long (24.7 ± 1.9 mm) upon recovery at Day 15 of gestation, a total of 348 genes were differentially expressed. Of these, 221 genes were up-regulated and 127 were down-regulated in long compared to short conceptuses. In summary, differences in gene expression were identified between conceptuses recovered on Day 15 of gestation, based on their length. These data may be used to identify genes and cellular pathways involved in enhanced conceptus elongation that could serve as markers of successful pregnancy. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 83: 424-441, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013032     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of the uterine lumen in fertility-classified heifers: I. Glucose, prostaglandins, and lipids†.

Authors:  Joao G N Moraes; Susanta K Behura; Thomas W Geary; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Analysis of the uterine lumen in fertility-classified heifers: II. Proteins and metabolites†.

Authors:  Joao G N Moraes; Susanta K Behura; Jeanette V Bishop; Thomas R Hansen; Thomas W Geary; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Bovine endometrium responds differentially to age-matched short and long conceptuses†.

Authors:  José María Sánchez; Daniel J Mathew; Susanta K Behura; Claudia Passaro; Gilles Charpigny; Stephen T Butler; Thomas E Spencer; Pat Lonergan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Uterine influences on conceptus development in fertility-classified animals.

Authors:  Joao G N Moraes; Susanta K Behura; Thomas W Geary; Peter J Hansen; Holly L Neibergs; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Influences of sire conception rate on pregnancy establishment in dairy cattle.

Authors:  M Sofia Ortega; João G N Moraes; David J Patterson; Michael F Smith; Susanta K Behura; Scott Poock; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Interferon tau-dependent and independent effects of the bovine conceptus on the endometrial transcriptome†.

Authors:  Daniel J Mathew; José M Sánchez; Claudia Passaro; Gilles Charpigny; Susanta K Behura; Thomas E Spencer; Patrick Lonergan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?

Authors:  Ligiane Oliveira Leme; Grazieli Marinheiro Machado; Andrei Antonioni Guedes Fidelis; Ana Luiza Silva Guimarães; José Felipe Warmiling Sprícigo; José Oliveira Carvalho; I Pivato; Maurício Machaim Franco; Margot Alves Nunes Dode
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  Conceptus metabolomic profiling reveals stage-specific phenotypes leading up to pregnancy recognition in cattle†.

Authors:  Constantine A Simintiras; José M Sánchez; Michael McDonald; Elena O'Callaghan; Ahmed A Aburima; Patrick Lonergan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Application of multi-omics data integration and machine learning approaches to identify epigenetic and transcriptomic differences between in vitro and in vivo produced bovine embryos.

Authors:  Maria B Rabaglino; Alan O'Doherty; Jan Bojsen-Møller Secher; Patrick Lonergan; Poul Hyttel; Trudee Fair; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of heat stress on embryonic development during first 16 days of gestation in dairy cows.

Authors:  Ramanathan Kasimanickam; Vanmathy Kasimanickam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.