| Literature DB >> 27012925 |
Christian P Bertholle1, Ellen Meijer1, Willem Back2,3, Arjan Stegeman1, P René van Weeren2, Arie van Nes4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In today's porcine industry, lameness has a major welfare and economic impact, and is often caused by osteochondrosis (OC). The etiological factors of the disease have been studied in depth, however, to this day, little is known about the natural course of the disorder and how it can be detected at an early stage in pigs. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the potential of three non-invasive techniques for the detection and monitoring of early OC processes in piglets. A group of weaned piglets (n = 19) were examined longitudinally using radiographs, a visual lameness scoring scheme and a quantitative pressure-mat based locomotion analysis system to detect OC in the humeroradial, femoropatellar and tarsocrural joints. At several time points, a selection of animals was euthanized for post-mortem examinations, including histology, which was the gold standard.Entities:
Keywords: Early detection; Gait analysis; Histology; Lameness; Osteochondrosis; Pig health; Radiography
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27012925 PMCID: PMC4807589 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0682-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Histology scores for n = 19 pigs (using both left and right sides of the joint were combined and the overall worst score from all investigated locations within the joints)
Left/right comparison of OC histological status (n = 19)
| Humeroradial ( | Femoropatellar ( | Tarsocrural ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilateral lesions (both scores >1) | 9.4 % | 33.4 % | 8.0 % |
| Bilateral no lesions (both scores 0) | 56.3 % | 23.1 % | 68.0 % |
| 1 side score 0, the other score >1 | 31.3 % | 25.6 % | 12.0 % |
| 1 side score 0, the other score >2 | 3.1 % | 18.0 % | 12.0 % |
aOnly the outcomes where left and right histology scores were available for each location
Fig. 2ROC curves showing the difference in sensitivity and specificity of radiography versus the gold standard, histology using various thresholds
Description of the sensitivity and specificity of radiography for the detection of OC as defined by the gold standard, histology (n = 10)
| Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | AUC | Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roc 1 (Both H&R scores >0) | 83.3 | 61.1 | 72.3 | 63.61–82.22 % |
| Roc 2 (Both H&R scores >1) | 81.4 | 67.8 | 75.3 | 65.66–85.79 % |
| Roc 3 (Both H&R scores >2) | 77.5 | 81.2 | 80.9 | 69.49–92.24 % |
| Roc 4 (Both H&R scores >3) | 71.8 | 100.0 | 89.1 | 79.9 %–98.2 % |
R scores radiographic scores, H scores histological scores, AUC area under the curve, ROC
Fig. 3a–i. Typical images of the histological grades with corresponding radiographic findings. Photo pairs a, b, d, e and g, h are radiographic images taken of 3 different respective pigs at 14 weeks of age. Pictures C, F and I are the corresponding histological slides in chronological order to the radiographic paired images. All stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All pictures depict assessments of the femoropatellar joint with G/H/I being from the left limb only. a–c represent the lateral side and d–f and g–i represent the medial side of the distal femoral condyle. All three pairs represent animals with no OC lesions present (a–c), with mild OC lesions (R = 2 and H = 3, d–f) and with severe OC lesions (R = 4 and H = 4, g–i)
Frequencies of lesion development detected radiographically at 7, 11 and 14 weeks of age (n = 20, for 10 pigs and 2 sides for each joint)
| Grade | Lesions present | Stationary | Progression | Regression | Resolution | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–11 weeks | ||||||
| Humeroradial | 0 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Femoropatellar | 0 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 4 | |
| Tarsocrural | 0 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 11–14 weeks | ||||||
| Humeroradial | 0 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Femoropatellar | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | |
| Tarsocrural | 0 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Percentages of the frequencies of all visual scoring categories scored (VS scores) by both raters for all pigs measured at all time points
| Traits | Agreement (%) | Disagreement (%) | Missing scores (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| O or X shape fore legs | 95 | 4 | 1 |
| Sickled or Buckled fore legs | 46 | 54 | 0 |
| Steep/Low angled Pasterns fore | 94 | 6 | 0 |
| Claw size fore | 99 | 0 | 1 |
| O or X shape hind legs | 88 | 11 | 1 |
| Straight or Sickled hind legs | 94 | 5 | 1 |
| Steep/Low angled Pasterns hind | 91 | 8 | 1 |
| Claw size hind | 99 | 0 | 1 |
| Ham | 91 | 8 | 1 |
| Gait pattern | 93 | 6 | 1 |
| Twisting hocks | 99 | 0 | 1 |
| Swaying hind | 95 | 4 | 1 |
Intra-class correlation data for the pressure mat parameters
| Average | Average | Average | Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAX | VI | CA | Pmax | |
| ICC(1) | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.44 |
| F-Test | 5.51 | 5.75 | 4.98 | 3.50 |
| P value | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Associations between visual scoring and histology (9 joint locations - n = 12)
| Visual scoring element | Animal or Joint level | Spearman’s rank correlation test | Benjamini and Hochberg correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pasterns hind | Femoropatellar | −.786 ( | 0.01 |
Associations between pressure mat and histology data (9 joint locations - n = 12)
| Pressure mat ASIs of kinetic factors | Histology OC score level (Joint or animal level) | Spearman’s test | Benjamini and Hochberg correction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fore/Hind ASIs | ASI CA Right | Animal | −0.772 ( | 0.05 |
| ASI Pmax Right | Femoropatellar | 0.822 ( | 0.03 | |
| ASI Pmax Left | Femoropatellar | 0.751 ( | 0.05 | |
Fig. 4Schematic drawing of the custom-built runway with a pressure mat for quantitative gait assessment
Radiography grading (from Dik et al. [9])
| Grade | Classification | Bone contour | Subchondral bone texture | Fragment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Normal | Rounded | Diffuse density | Absent |
| 1 | Minimal | Smoothly flattened | Obscure lucency | Absent |
| 2 | Mild | Irregularly flattened | Obvious, ill-bordered local lucency | Absent |
| 3 | Moderate | Small, rounded/irregular concavity | Obvious, well-bordered local lucency | Small fragment(s) |
| 4 | Severe | Large, rounded/irregular concavity | Obvious, well-defined extensive lucency | Large fragment(s) |
Schematic overview of the histological grading system used in this study
| Grade | Classification | Signs |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Normal | Vessels with erythrocytes, No necrotic areas, No irregularities on ossification front, Normal thickness of cartilage |
| 1 | Normal-Mod | Vessels with erythrocytes, Few to no very small necrotic areas, Some irregularities on ossification front, Some mild focal thickening of cartilage |
| 2 | Moderate | Vessels with/without erythrocytes, Some mild necrotic areas (not large), Mild irregularities on ossification front, Moderate focal thickening of cartilage |
| 3 | Mod-Severe | Vessels mostly without erythrocytes, Some large necrotic areas, Distinct irregularities on ossification front, areas of thickened cartilage |
| 4 | Severe | Vessels without or with extremely few erythrocytes, very large necrotic areas, Very severe irregularities of ossification front, Severe thickening of cartilage areas |