Literature DB >> 27012549

Mapping neurogenesis onset in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis.

Leah Herrgen1,2,3, Colin J Akerman1.   

Abstract

Neural progenitor cells have a central role in the development and evolution of the vertebrate brain. During early brain development, neural progenitors first expand their numbers through repeated proliferative divisions and then begin to exhibit neurogenic divisions. The transparent and experimentally accessible optic tectum of Xenopus laevis is an excellent model system for the study of the cell biology of neurogenesis, but the precise spatial and temporal relationship between proliferative and neurogenic progenitors has not been explored in this system. Here we construct a spatial map of proliferative and neurogenic divisions through lineage tracing of individual progenitors and their progeny. We find a clear spatial separation of proliferative and neurogenic progenitors along the anterior-posterior axis of the optic tectum, with proliferative progenitors located more posteriorly and neurogenic progenitors located more anteriorly. Since individual progenitors are repositioned toward more anterior locations as they mature, this spatial separation likely reflects an increasing restriction in the proliferative potential of individual progenitors. We then examined whether the transition from proliferative to neurogenic behavior correlates with cellular properties that have previously been implicated in regulating neurogenesis onset. Our data reveal that the transition from proliferation to neurogenesis is associated with a small change in cleavage plane orientation and a more pronounced change in cell cycle kinetics in a manner reminiscent of observations from mammalian systems. Our findings highlight the potential to use the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis as an accessible system for the study of the cell biology of neurogenesis.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 76: 1328-1341, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Xenopus laevis; cell cycle length; cleavage plane orientation; neural progenitor; neurogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012549      PMCID: PMC5074367          DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neurobiol        ISSN: 1932-8451            Impact factor:   3.964


  41 in total

1.  Selective lengthening of the cell cycle in the neurogenic subpopulation of neural progenitor cells during mouse brain development.

Authors:  Federico Calegari; Wulf Haubensak; Christiane Haffner; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Roles of NR2A and NR2B in the development of dendritic arbor morphology in vivo.

Authors:  Rebecca C Ewald; Kendall R Van Keuren-Jensen; Carlos D Aizenman; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual activity regulates neural progenitor cells in developing xenopus CNS through musashi1.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  The cell biology of neurogenesis: toward an understanding of the development and evolution of the neocortex.

Authors:  Elena Taverna; Magdalena Götz; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 5.  Neurogenesis during development of the vertebrate central nervous system.

Authors:  Judith T M L Paridaen; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  AMPA receptors regulate experience-dependent dendritic arbor growth in vivo.

Authors:  Kurt Haas; Jianli Li; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Insulin receptor signaling regulates synapse number, dendritic plasticity, and circuit function in vivo.

Authors:  Shu-Ling Chiu; Chih-Ming Chen; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Type A GABA-receptor-dependent synaptic transmission sculpts dendritic arbor structure in Xenopus tadpoles in vivo.

Authors:  Wanhua Shen; Jorge Santos Da Silva; Haiyan He; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  PKM zeta restricts dendritic arbor growth by filopodial and branch stabilization within the intact and awake developing brain.

Authors:  Xue Feng Liu; Parisa Karimi Tari; Kurt Haas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural stem and progenitor cells shorten S-phase on commitment to neuron production.

Authors:  Yoko Arai; Jeremy N Pulvers; Christiane Haffner; Britta Schilling; Ina Nüsslein; Federico Calegari; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nutrient restriction causes reversible G2 arrest in Xenopus neural progenitors.

Authors:  Caroline R McKeown; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  In Vivo Analysis of the Neurovascular Niche in the Developing Xenopus Brain.

Authors:  Melissa Lau; Jianli Li; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-07-31

3.  Epigenetic regulation of GABAergic differentiation in the developing brain.

Authors:  Juanmei Gao; Yuhao Luo; Yufang Lu; Xiaohua Wu; Peiyao Chen; Xinyu Zhang; Lu Han; Mengsheng Qiu; Wanhua Shen
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.