Literature DB >> 27012445

Fecal hemoglobin concentration is useful for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Nam Hee Kim1, Min-Jung Kwon2, Hyun-Young Kim1, Taeheon Lee1, Seok Hyeon Jeong1, Dong Il Park1, Kyuyong Choi1, Yoon Suk Jung3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) allows quantitation of fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb), it is typically used as a binary result to identify subjects above a predetermined cut-off concentration. AIMS: To investigate whether f-Hb concentration is useful for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia (CRN).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in a university hospital in Korea. Of 34,547 participants who underwent FIT from June 2013 to May 2015, 1532 (4.4%) showed positive results (≥100ng Hb/ml). Of participants with positive results, 738 subjects aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy were analyzed.
RESULTS: Increasing quartile of f-Hb concentration (Q4 vs. Q1; odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-6.34), as well as older age, male sex, smoking, and metabolic syndrome (MetS), was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of advanced CRN. Risk for advanced CRN increased 5.13-, 4.27-, 5.12-, and 7.15-fold, respectively, among individuals with f-Hb in the fourth quartile who had risk factors such as age ≥70 years, male sex, smoking, and MetS compared with individuals with first quartile levels of f-Hb who did not have those risk factors.
CONCLUSION: In addition to age, sex, smoking status, and MetS, f-Hb concentration in individuals with positive results from FIT can be used to stratify the probability of detection of advanced CRN.
Copyright © 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced colorectal neoplasia; Quantitative fecal immunochemical test; Risk factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012445     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  5 in total

1.  A True Positive and a False Negative? The Dilemma of Negative Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test.

Authors:  J S Hunt; C Cock; E L Symonds
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Correlating Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Results with Neoplastic Findings on Colonoscopy in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Neal Shahidi; Laura Gentile; Lovedeep Gondara; Jeremy Hamm; Colleen E McGahan; Robert Enns; Jennifer Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-26

3.  Quantile-based fecal hemoglobin concentration for assessing colorectal neoplasms with 1,263,717 Taiwanese screenees.

Authors:  Szu-Min Peng; Han-Mo Chiu; Hsiao-Hsuan Jen; Chen-Yang Hsu; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Yi-Chia Lee; Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Cause of Death, Mortality and Occult Blood in Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Lasse Kaalby; Issam Al-Najami; Ulrik Deding; Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff; Robert J C Steele; Morten Kobaek-Larsen; Aasma Shaukat; Morten Rasmussen; Gunnar Baatrup
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?

Authors:  Eunate Arana-Arri; Isabel Idigoras; Begoña Uranga; Raquel Pérez; Ana Irurzun; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Callum G Fraser; Isabel Portillo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.