Literature DB >> 27012314

Factors affecting characterization and localization of interindividual differences in functional connectivity using MRI.

Raag D Airan1, Joshua T Vogelstein2,3, Jay J Pillai1, Brian Caffo4, James J Pekar1,5, Haris I Sair1.   

Abstract

Much recent attention has been paid to quantifying anatomic and functional neuroimaging on the individual subject level. For optimal individual subject characterization, specific acquisition and analysis features need to be identified that maximize interindividual variability while concomitantly minimizing intra-subject variability. We delineate the effect of various acquisition parameters (length of acquisition, sampling frequency) and analysis methods (time course extraction, region of interest parcellation, and thresholding of connectivity-derived network graphs) on characterizing individual subject differentiation. We utilize a non-parametric statistical metric that quantifies the degree to which a parameter set allows this individual subject differentiation by both maximizing interindividual variance and minimizing intra-individual variance. We apply this metric to analysis of four publicly available test-retest resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data sets. We find that for the question of maximizing individual differentiation, (i) for increasing sampling, there is a relative tradeoff between increased sampling frequency and increased acquisition time; (ii) for the sizes of the interrogated data sets, only 3-4 min of acquisition time was sufficient to maximally differentiate each subject with an algorithm that utilized no a priori information regarding subject identification; and (iii) brain regions that most contribute to this individual subject characterization lie in the default mode, attention, and executive control networks. These findings may guide optimal rs-fMRI experiment design and may elucidate the neural bases for subject-to-subject differences. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1986-1997, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional connectivity; resting state fMRI; subject-level differences

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012314      PMCID: PMC5516891          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  33 in total

1.  Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Alan J Huang; Aliya Gifford; Deepti S Vikram; Issel Anne L Lim; Jonathan A D Farrell; John A Bogovic; Jun Hua; Min Chen; Samson Jarso; Seth A Smith; Suresh Joel; Susumu Mori; James J Pekar; Peter B Barker; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.

Authors:  Yashar Behzadi; Khaled Restom; Joy Liau; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Toward discovery science of human brain function.

Authors:  Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization.

Authors:  Koene R A Van Dijk; Trey Hedden; Archana Venkataraman; Karleyton C Evans; Sara W Lazar; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  M H Lee; C D Smyser; J S Shimony
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Individual variability is not noise.

Authors:  Karl Zilles; Katrin Amunts
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Effective Preprocessing Procedures Virtually Eliminate Distance-Dependent Motion Artifacts in Resting State FMRI.

Authors:  Hang Joon Jo; Stephen J Gotts; Richard C Reynolds; Peter A Bandettini; Alex Martin; Robert W Cox; Ziad S Saad
Journal:  J Appl Math       Date:  2013-05-21

8.  Individual variability in functional connectivity architecture of the human brain.

Authors:  Sophia Mueller; Danhong Wang; Michael D Fox; B T Thomas Yeo; Jorge Sepulcre; Mert R Sabuncu; Rebecca Shafee; Jie Lu; Hesheng Liu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity.

Authors:  Daniel A Handwerker; Vinai Roopchansingh; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Age-related differences in test-retest reliability in resting-state brain functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jie Song; Alok S Desphande; Timothy B Meier; Dana L Tudorascu; Svyatoslav Vergun; Veena A Nair; Bharat B Biswal; Mary E Meyerand; Rasmus M Birn; Pierre Bellec; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Development and Emergence of Individual Variability in the Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Preterm Human Brain.

Authors:  Yuehua Xu; Miao Cao; Xuhong Liao; Mingrui Xia; Xindi Wang; Tina Jeon; Minhui Ouyang; Lina Chalak; Nancy Rollins; Hao Huang; Yong He
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Xuhong Liao; Mingrui Xia; Yong He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Spatiotemporal Network Markers of Individual Variability in the Human Functional Connectome.

Authors:  Cleofé Peña-Gómez; Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger; Jorge Sepulcre; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Considering factors affecting the connectome-based identification process: Comment on Waller et al.

Authors:  Corey Horien; Stephanie Noble; Emily S Finn; Xilin Shen; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Genetic variants in Alzheimer disease - molecular and brain network approaches.

Authors:  Chris Gaiteri; Sara Mostafavi; Christopher J Honey; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 7.  Resting-state neuroimaging in social anxiety disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simone Mizzi; Mangor Pedersen; Valentina Lorenzetti; Markus Heinrichs; Izelle Labuschagne
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting cognitive functions via autoencoder.

Authors:  Biao Cai; Gemeng Zhang; Aiying Zhang; Li Xiao; Wenxing Hu; Julia M Stephen; Tony W Wilson; Vince D Calhoun; Yu-Ping Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Striatal subdivisions that coherently interact with multiple cerebrocortical networks.

Authors:  Akitoshi Ogawa; Takahiro Osada; Masaki Tanaka; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki; Aki Nikolaidis; Michael P Milham; Seiki Konishi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Ten problems and solutions when predicting individual outcome from lesion site after stroke.

Authors:  Cathy J Price; Thomas M Hope; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.