Literature DB >> 27011874

The reliability of national videos related to the kidney stones on YouTube.

Mustafa Serinken1, Cenker Eken2, Fikret Erdemir3, Hayri Eliçabuk4, Aykut Başer5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Kidney stones are one of the most common disorders of the urinary tract. With increasing awareness, a larger proportion of patients are seeking medical knowledge from the Internet. In present study, the features, reliability and efficacy of videos on YouTube related to the treatment of kidney stones were evaluated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In December 2014, YouTube was searched using keywords "nephrolithiasis"; "renal calculi"; "renal stones"; and "kidney stones" for videos uploaded containing relevant information about the disease. Only videos in Turkish were included in the study. Two physician viewers watched each video and classified them as useful, partially useful and useless according to European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines. The source, length, number of views, number of favourable opinions, and days since uploaded date of the all videos were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 600 videos were analysed The median length of videos was 6.7±10.4 (median: 3, IQR: 0.03-58) minutes. Each video was viewed at an average of 2368 (min: 11, max: 97133) times. Most of the videos (32.8%) were created by academicians and physicians. Nearly half (47.4%) of the videos were uploaded in 2014. The majority of the videos (62.5%) contained information for treatment. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureterorenoscopy were the most common treatment modalities (32.8% and 28.0%, respectively ) in these videos. A statistically significant difference was not detected between view numbers and source of videos (p=0.87). However, there was a statistically significant difference between usefulness to the viewers and source of videos. Hospital -based videos were detected to be more useful (p=0.000).
CONCLUSION: As a result, videos that would be prepared in internet environment by professional individuals or organizations in a way which would attract attention and be easily comprehended by the public could contribute to the knowledge and education of our society about the stone disease which is commonly seen in our country.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; YouTube; internet; kidney stone; nephrolithiasis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27011874      PMCID: PMC4791085          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.29567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  16 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

2.  YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Karthik Murugiah; Ajay Vallakati; Kanishka Rajput; Akshay Sood; Narasa Reddy Challa
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Availability and quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation information for Spanish-speaking population on the Internet.

Authors:  Kirsten Y Liu; Jason S Haukoos; Comilla Sasson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Hospital cost analysis of management of patients with renal colic in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ibrahim Turkcuer; Mustafa Serinken; Ozgur Karcioglu; Mehmet Zencir; M Kemal Keysan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-24

Review 5.  Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jodi A Antonelli; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Analysis of the YouTube videos on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Francis Solange Vieira Tourinho; Kleyton Santos de Medeiros; Pétala Tuani Candido De Oliveira Salvador; Grayce Loyse Tinoco Castro; Viviane Euzébia Pereira Santos
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

7.  Are YouTube videos accurate and reliable on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Authors:  Serpil Yaylaci; Mustafa Serinken; Cenker Eken; Ozgur Karcioglu; Atakan Yilmaz; Hayri Elicabuk; Onur Dal
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994.

Authors:  Kiriaki K Stamatelou; Mildred E Francis; Camille A Jones; Leroy M Nyberg; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center.

Authors:  Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Patrick Krombach; Thorsten Bach; Axel Häcker; Peter Alken; Maurice Stephan Michel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics of patients presenting with renal colic in the emergency department.

Authors:  Mustafa Serinken; Ozgur Karcioglu; Ibrahim Turkcuer; Halis Ilke Ozkan; Mustafa Kemal Keysan; Aytaç Bukiran
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-09-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Intravenous paracetamol vs ibuprofen in renal colic: a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  E Cenker; M Serinken; E Uyanık
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Systematic assessment of information about surgical urinary stone treatment on YouTube.

Authors:  Manolis Pratsinis; Dominik Abt; Gautier Müllhaupt; Janine Langenauer; Thomas Knoll; Hans-Peter Schmid; Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.