Literature DB >> 27011510

Is Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy a Safe Procedure for Third and Fourth Grade Hemorrhoids? An Experience at Civil Hospital Karachi.

Rafaqat Bota1, Mushtaq Ahmed1, Adnan Aziz2.   

Abstract

Hemorrhoids are amongst the most frequent anorectal conditions affecting approximately 4-36 % of the general population. The study was carried out to assess the clinical consequences of stapled hemorrhoidectomy comparing results with other published literature regarding postoperative pain, bleeding, incontinence, and other complications. A total of 120 patients were included in this study with symptomatic grade 3 or 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids, who underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy from January 2006 to January 2012 at the Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan. In 92 patients (76.6 %), proctological examination showed grade 3 hemorrhoids. Fourth degree hemorrhoids were found in 28 cases (23.4 %). Hospitalization time ranged between 1 and 3 days (median time was 34 h). Seventy-eight patients were discharged on the first postoperative day, without severe pain, and the remaining 42 patients were discharge on the third day. Two cases of postoperative pain and thrombosis were found as postoperative complications. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safe and quick procedure associated with less pain, better outcome, and early recovery with shorter hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemorrhoids; Post operative complications; Post operative pain; Staple hemorrhoidectomy

Year:  2014        PMID: 27011510      PMCID: PMC4775568          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-014-1140-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  17 in total

1.  Closed hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  J A FERGUSON; J R HEATON
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1959 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  W-J Shao; G-C H Li; Z H-K Zhang; B-L Yang; G-D Sun; Y-Q Chen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R G Molloy; D Kingsmore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B J Mehigan; J R Monson; J E Hartley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Early experience of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in a community hospital setting.

Authors:  Eric Touzin; Susan Hegge; Craig McKinley
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for grade III haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Ammaturo; A Tufano; E Spiniello; B Sodano; E M Iervolino; A Brillantino; B Braccio
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.