Literature DB >> 27011485

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) for Rectal Cancer: University Hospital of North Tees Experience.

Khalid A Osman1, Daniel Ryan1, Sorena Afshar1, Zakir K Mohamed1, Dharmendra Garg1, Talvinder Gill1.   

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique that is increasingly being used to treat early rectal cancer (T1/T2). We studied the outcomes of TEM for rectal cancer at our institution looking at the indication, recurrence rate, need for further radical surgery, 30-day and 12-month mortality and complication rate. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of cases between 2008 and 2012: 110 TEM procedures were performed during this period: 40 were confirmed rectal cancers and 70 were benign. We analysed the data for the 40 patients with confirmed rectal cancer. Thirty (75 %) of the subjects were male with a mean age of 71 ± 10 years (range 49-90 years) and 19 (48 %) patients were ASA 3 and 4. Nineteen (48 %) of cancers were pT1, eighteen (45 %) were pT2, two (5 %) were pT3 and one was yPT0. Mean specimen size was 66 ± 20 mm (range 33-120 mm) with a mean polyp size of 41 ± 24 mm (range 18-110 mm). The mean cancer size was 24 ± 13 mm (range 2-50 mm). Average distance from the anal verge was 70 ± 37 mm (range 10-150 mm), and the mean operating time was 72 ± 22 min (range 40-120 min), with an average blood loss of 28 ± 15 ml (range 10-50ml). Median hospital stay was 2 ± 1 days (range 1-7 days). Complete excision (R0) was achieved in 37 (93 %) patients. Minor post-operative complications included urinary retention in two and pyrexia in three patients. There were no 30-day or 12-month mortalities. Mean follow-up was 13 ± 11 months, range (3-40 months) Local recurrence occurred in two (5 %) patients, both underwent redo TEM. Twelve (30 %) patients underwent laparoscopic radical resections (seven AR and five APER) post-TEM. Post-operative histology confirmed pT0N0 in 7/12 patients. Three were lymph node-positive (T0N1), one was pT3N1 and the fifth was pT3N2. TEM is associated with quicker recovery, shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than radical surgery. It is a good alternative to radical surgery in early rectal cancer, especially for high-risk patients. Recurrent tumours can be treated with redo TEM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local resection; Radical surgery; Rectal cancer; Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Year:  2014        PMID: 27011485      PMCID: PMC4775597          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-014-1067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  29 in total

1.  Commentary on S. Q. Ashraf et al.

Authors:  S Halligan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  M A Shahir; V E P P Lemmens; L V van de Poll-Franse; A C Voogd; H Martijn; M L G Janssen-Heijnen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Transanal excision for low rectal cancers is curative in early-stage disease with favorable histology.

Authors:  S Blair; J D Ellenhorn
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Outcome following transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  I J Adam; A J Shorthouse
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Endoscopic surgery in the rectum.

Authors:  G Buess; R Theiss; M Günther; F Hutterer; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  A critical appraisal of endorectal ultrasound and transanal endoscopic microsurgery and decision-making in early rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Ashraf; R Hompes; A Slater; I Lindsey; S Bach; N J Mortensen; C Cunningham
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Management and outcome of local recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Stipa; Valentina Giaccaglia; Antonio Burza
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer.

Authors:  W Lee; D Lee; S Choi; H Chun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery--initial experience from three centres in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R J Steele; M J Hershman; N J Mortensen; N C Armitage; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on functional outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  P G Doornebosch; M P Gosselink; P A Neijenhuis; W R Schouten; R A E M Tollenaar; E J R de Graaf
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Zinicola; R Nascimbeni; R Cirocchi; G Gagliardi; N Cracco; M Giuffrida; G Pedrazzi; G A Binda
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Authors:  Nik Dekkers; Hao Dang; Jolein van der Kraan; Saskia le Cessie; Philip P Oldenburg; Jan W Schoones; Alexandra M J Langers; Monique E van Leerdam; Jeanin E van Hooft; Yara Backes; Katarina Levic; Alexander Meining; Giorgio M Saracco; Fabian A Holman; Koen C M J Peeters; Leon M G Moons; Pascal G Doornebosch; James C H Hardwick; Jurjen J Boonstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.