PURPOSE: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises a group of overlapping hereditary disorders of connective tissue with significant morbidity and mortality, including major vascular complications. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in a mixed EDS cohort. METHODS: We developed and applied PCR-based NGS assays for targeted, unbiased sequencing of 12 collagen and aortopathy genes to a cohort of 177 unrelated EDS patients. Variants were scored blind to previous genetic testing and then compared with results of previous Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pathogenic variants in COL5A1/2, COL3A1, FBN1, and COL1A1 and four likely pathogenic variants in COL1A1, TGFBR1/2, and SMAD3 were identified by the NGS assays. These included all previously detected single-nucleotide and other short pathogenic variants in these genes, and seven newly detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants leading to clinically significant diagnostic revisions. Twenty-two variants of uncertain significance were identified, seven of which were in aortopathy genes and required clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: Unbiased NGS-based sequencing made new molecular diagnoses outside the expected EDS genotype-phenotype relationship and identified previously undetected clinically actionable variants in aortopathy susceptibility genes. These data may be of value in guiding future clinical pathways for genetic diagnosis in EDS.Genet Med 18 11, 1119-1127.
PURPOSE: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises a group of overlapping hereditary disorders of connective tissue with significant morbidity and mortality, including major vascular complications. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in a mixed EDS cohort. METHODS: We developed and applied PCR-based NGS assays for targeted, unbiased sequencing of 12 collagen and aortopathy genes to a cohort of 177 unrelated EDS patients. Variants were scored blind to previous genetic testing and then compared with results of previous Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pathogenic variants in COL5A1/2, COL3A1, FBN1, and COL1A1 and four likely pathogenic variants in COL1A1, TGFBR1/2, and SMAD3 were identified by the NGS assays. These included all previously detected single-nucleotide and other short pathogenic variants in these genes, and seven newly detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants leading to clinically significant diagnostic revisions. Twenty-two variants of uncertain significance were identified, seven of which were in aortopathy genes and required clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: Unbiased NGS-based sequencing made new molecular diagnoses outside the expected EDS genotype-phenotype relationship and identified previously undetected clinically actionable variants in aortopathy susceptibility genes. These data may be of value in guiding future clinical pathways for genetic diagnosis in EDS.Genet Med 18 11, 1119-1127.
Authors: Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Bart L Loeys; Harry C Dietz; Alan C Braverman; Bert L Callewaert; Julie De Backer; Richard B Devereux; Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Guillaume Jondeau; Laurence Faivre; Dianna M Milewicz; Reed E Pyeritz; Paul D Sponseller; Paul Wordsworth; Anne M De Paepe Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Bart L Loeys; Ulrike Schwarze; Tammy Holm; Bert L Callewaert; George H Thomas; Hariyadarshi Pannu; Julie F De Backer; Gretchen L Oswald; Sofie Symoens; Sylvie Manouvrier; Amy E Roberts; Francesca Faravelli; M Alba Greco; Reed E Pyeritz; Dianna M Milewicz; Paul J Coucke; Duke E Cameron; Alan C Braverman; Peter H Byers; Anne M De Paepe; Harry C Dietz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Denise van der Linde; Ingrid M B H van de Laar; Aida M Bertoli-Avella; Rogier A Oldenburg; Jos A Bekkers; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Anton H van den Meiracker; Adriaan Moelker; Fop van Kooten; Ingrid M E Frohn-Mulder; Janneke Timmermans; Els Moltzer; Jan M Cobben; Lut van Laer; Bart Loeys; Julie De Backer; Paul J Coucke; Anne De Paepe; Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Marja W Wessels; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jan Halbritter; Katrina Diaz; Moumita Chaki; Jonathan D Porath; Brendan Tarrier; Clementine Fu; Jamie L Innis; Susan J Allen; Robert H Lyons; Constantinos J Stefanidis; Heymut Omran; Neveen A Soliman; Edgar A Otto Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Jacob Steinle; Waheeda A Hossain; Olivia J Veatch; Samuel P Strom; Merlin G Butler Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 2.578
Authors: Likhitha Kolla; Michael C Kelly; Zoe F Mann; Alejandro Anaya-Rocha; Kathryn Ellis; Abigail Lemons; Adam T Palermo; Kathy S So; Joseph C Mays; Joshua Orvis; Joseph C Burns; Ronna Hertzano; Elizabeth C Driver; Matthew W Kelley Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Chloe Angwin; Angela F Brady; Marina Colombi; David J P Ferguson; Rebecca Pollitt; F Michael Pope; Marco Ritelli; Sofie Symoens; Neeti Ghali; Fleur S van Dijk Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Ruwan Weerakkody; David Ross; David A Parry; Bulat Ziganshin; Jana Vandrovcova; Piyush Gampawar; Abdulshakur Abdullah; Jennifer Biggs; Julia Dumfarth; Yousef Ibrahim; Colin Bicknell; Mark Field; John Elefteriades; Nick Cheshire; Timothy J Aitman Journal: Genet Med Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 8.822