| Literature DB >> 27010798 |
Jiajun Yan1, Jianbo Zhang1, Kaiyan Sun1,2, Dan Chang1,3, Shiqie Bai1, Yixin Shen2, Linkai Huang3, Jin Zhang1, Yu Zhang1, Yanhai Dong3.
Abstract
Erianthus arundinaceus is not only an important germplasm resource for sugarcane breeding but also a potential bioenergy plant. Making clear the distribution of the chromosome ploidy of wild E. arundinaceus in china is the premise of the research and utilization of this species. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the ploidy level and DNA content of the 55 E. arundinaceus accessions using flow cytometry and to identify the correlation between ploidy and phenotypic traits. Among the 55 accessions, four tetraploids and 51 hexaploids were identified. The four tetraploids originated from Mengma Yunnan, Shuangjiang Yunnan, Gaozhou Guangdong and Chengle Sichuan. The mean DNA content was 4.82 pg/2C for the tetraploid and 7.30 pg/2C for the hexaploid plants. The ploidy was negatively correlated with cellulose content and positively correlated (P<0.05) with plant height, stem diameter, leaf width, dry weight per plant, fresh weight per plant and hemicellulose content. However, ploidy was not correlated with leaf length, tiller number and the ratio of dry weight and fresh weight. This study will be useful for revealing the distribution of the ploidy of wild E. arundinaceus in Chin, traits markers analysis, and utilization of this species, such as cultivar improvement and sugarcane breeding in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27010798 PMCID: PMC4806844 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The fluorescence peak of tetraploid and hexaploid Erianthus arundinaceus.
The accession number(NO.), origin, altitude, latitude, longitude, ploidy level and mean DNA content of each accessions.
| NO. | Origin | Altitude/m | Latitude/N | Longitude/E | DNA ±SE(pg) | Ploidy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Hanzhong,Shanxi | 801.0 | 32°32′22″ | 107°37′28″ | 7.407±0.026 | Hexaploid |
| E2 | Guangyuan,Sichuan | 658.0 | 30°53′11″ | 105°48′45″ | 7.543±0.066 | Hexaploid |
| E3 | Shimian,Sichuan | 1024.0 | 29°27′36″ | 102°11′29″ | 7.274±0.025 | Hexaploid |
| E4 | Xichang,Sichuan | 1475.0 | 27°46′58″ | 102°12′42″ | 8.032±0.035 | Hexaploid |
| E5 | Panzhihua,Sichuan | 962.0 | 26°37′23″ | 101°48′36″ | 7.274±0.060 | Hexaploid |
| E6 | Huili,Sichuan | 1743.0 | 26°38′06″ | 102°15′03″ | 7.938±0.334 | Hexaploid |
| E8 | Ningnan,Sichuan | 694.0 | 26°58′59″ | 102°48′23″ | 7.860±0.107 | Hexaploid |
| E9 | Heishui,Sichuan | 2350.0 | 32°09′41″ | 103°02′49″ | 7.045±0.034 | Hexaploid |
| E10 | Hanyuan,Sichuan | 891.0 | 29°26′40″ | 102°37′01″ | 7.066±0.098 | Hexaploid |
| E11 | Doujun,Guizhou | 840.8 | 26°16′32″ | 107°29′58″ | 7.273±0.047 | Hexaploid |
| E12 | Dushan,Guizhou | 943.8 | 25°45′32″ | 107°34′18″ | 7.330±0.060 | Hexaploid |
| E13 | Libo,Guizhou | 546.3 | 25°27′22″ | 107°53′16″ | 7.075±0.039 | Hexaploid |
| E14 | Sandou,Guizhou | 740.8 | 25°30′39″ | 107°31′53″ | 6.730±0.079 | Hexaploid |
| E15 | Congjiang,Guizhou | 180.0 | 25°47′06″ | 109°03′50″ | 7.300±0.047 | Hexaploid |
| E16 | Rongjiang,Guizhou | 235.0 | 25°56′20″ | 108°31′33″ | 7.232±0.027 | Hexaploid |
| E17 | Nandan,Guangxi | 1127.0 | 25°06′08″ | 107°29′60″ | 7.128±0.041 | Hexaploid |
| E18 | Hechi,Guangxi | 283.8 | 24°39′00″ | 107°51′49″ | 6.911±0.155 | Hexaploid |
| E19 | Duan,Guangxi | 148.8 | 24°03′15″ | 108°02′46″ | 7.256±0.088 | Hexaploid |
| E20 | Wuzhou,Guangxi | 39.0 | 23°29′27″ | 111°15′05″ | 7.084±0.097 | Hexaploid |
| E21 | Nanning,Guangxi | 89.7 | 22°37′39″ | 108°23′02″ | 7.482±0.107 | Hexaploid |
| E22 | Shaoping,Guangxi | 72.0 | 23°58′07″ | 111°06′01″ | 7.363±0.112 | Hexaploid |
| E23 | Zhongshan,Guangxi | 157.6 | 24°27′26″ | 111°05′20″ | 7.960±0.044 | Hexaploid |
| E24 | Pingle,Guangxi | 113.0 | 24°38′49″ | 110°38′22″ | 7.705±0.022 | Hexaploid |
| E25 | Guilin,Guangxi | 166.0 | 25°18′43″ | 110°08′31″ | 7.454±0.048 | Hexaploid |
| E26 | Longsheng,Guangxi | 226.0 | 25°48′11″ | 109°59′23″ | 7.485±0.108 | Hexaploid |
| E27 | Sanjiang,Guangxi | 168.0 | 25°46′45″ | 109°38′47″ | 7.065±0.034 | Hexaploid |
| E28 | Mengma,Yunnan | 531.0 | 30°23′54″ | 99°48′17″ | 4.937±0.068 | Tetraploid |
| E29 | Shuangjiang,Yunnan | 670.0 | 29°32′42″ | 99°49′11″ | 4.815±0.070 | Tetraploid |
| E30 | Lancang,Yunnan | 436.0 | 30°44′03″ | 99°48′30″ | 7.149±0.074 | Hexaploid |
| E33 | Suixi,Guangdong | 43.0 | 21°33′26″ | 110°00′52″ | 7.416±0.152 | Hexaploid |
| E35 | Gaozhou,Guangdong | 40.0 | 21°53′33″ | 110°49′46″ | 4.735±0.066 | Tetraploid |
| E36 | Xuwen,Guangdong | 9.0 | 20°55′15″ | 110°03′32″ | 7.372±0.119 | Hexaploid |
| E37 | Xinyi,Guangdong | 109.4 | 22°20′57″ | 110°54′44″ | 6.980±0.078 | Hexaploid |
| E38 | Hankou,Hannan | 4.3 | 20°01′50″ | 110°19′44″ | 6.865±0.113 | Hexaploid |
| E39 | Dingan,Hannan | 40.0 | 19°05′25″ | 110°10′47″ | 7.717±0.084 | Hexaploid |
| E40 | Tunchang,Hannan | 140.0 | 19°12′10″ | 109°59′05″ | 7.763±0.126 | Hexaploid |
| E41 | Wuzhishan,Hannan | 214.0 | 18°59′04″ | 109°33′56″ | 7.381±0.073 | Hexaploid |
| E42 | Baoting,Hannan | 71.0 | 18°33′47″ | 109°37′20″ | 7.208±0.041 | Hexaploid |
| E43 | Dongfang,Hannan | -2.0 | 18°56′51″ | 108°41′59″ | 7.163±0.382 | Hexaploid |
| E44 | Sanya,Hannan | 30.0 | 18°33′48″ | 109°37′20″ | 7.412±0.361 | Hexaploid |
| E45 | Sanyajiusuo,Hannnan | -32.0 | 18°25′47″ | 108°56′06″ | 7.489±0.203 | Hexaploid |
| E46 | Changjiang,Hannan | 78.0 | 19°19′12″ | 108°58′32″ | 6.901±0.185 | Hexaploid |
| E47 | Danzhou,Hannan | 19.6 | 19°43′06″ | 109°26′34″ | 7.148±0.183 | Hexaploid |
| E48 | Shuanghua,Sichuan | 890.0 | 30°38′48″ | 104°01′18″ | 7.095±0.057 | Hexaploid |
| E49 | Suangliu,Sichuan | 550.0 | 30°24′30″ | 103°54′00″ | 6.981±0.086 | Hexaploid |
| E50 | Jiajiang,Sichuan | 426.0 | 29°47′19″ | 103°41′19″ | 4.800±0.185 | Tetraploid |
| E51 | Leshan,Sichuan | 362.0 | 29°35′46″ | 103°46′09″ | 7.944±0.503 | Hexaploid |
| E52 | Meishan,Sichuan | 408.0 | 30°21′04″ | 103°50′46″ | 7.896±0.036 | Hexaploid |
| E53 | Longquan,Sichuan | 800.0 | 30°33′10″ | 104°19′34″ | 7.901±0.202 | Hexaploid |
| E54 | Yaan,Sichuan | 584.0 | 29°58′55″ | 102°16′55″ | 6.965±0.156 | Hexaploid |
| E55 | Doujiangyan,Sichuan | 700.0 | 31°02′09″ | 103°46′10″ | 7.222±0.096 | Hexaploid |
| E56 | Xinjin,Sichuan | 460.0 | 30°25′28″ | 103°48′20″ | 8.391±0.104 | Hexaploid |
| E57 | Wenjiang,Sichuan | 600.0 | 30°42′36″ | 103°46′30″ | 8.050±0.249 | Hexaploid |
| E58 | Suining,Sichuan | 419.0 | 30°01′38″ | 105°32′29″ | 8.221±0.224 | Hexaploid |
| E59 | Jinjiangtang,Sichuan | 625.0 | 30°40′51″ | 104°29′58″ | 8.162±0.106 | Hexaploid |
Fig 2The tree diagram of cluster analysis based on plant traits.
The mean agronomic traits of tetraploid and hexaploid, their correlation with ploidy level and 2C DNA content in E. arundinaceus.
| Traits | Tetraploid mean | Hexaploid mean | Ploidy | 2C DNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height, cm | 336.575±52.717 | 438.535±7.659 | 0.417 | 0.378 |
| Stem diameter, cm | 4.025±0.492 | 5.869±0.120 | 0.493 | 0.418 |
| Leaf length, cm | 158.200±15.832 | 177.676±2.973 | 0.228NS | 0.118NS |
| Leaf width, cm | 2.125±0.423 | 3.494±0.115 | 0.404 | 0.312 |
| Tiller number | 67.000±18.000 | 104.000±7.000 | 0.183NS | 0.109NS |
| SFW, kg | 11.350±4.424 | 31.494±2.075 | 0.344 | 0.226NS |
| SDW, kg | 4.975±2.137 | 12.586±0.862 | 0.315 | 0.191NS |
| Water rate, % | 61.2±4.3 | 59.1±0.8 | 0.084NS | 0.076NS |
Note: SFW stand for fresh weight, SDW stand for dry weight,
†Non-significant at the 0.05 probability level,
**Significant at the 0.01 probability level,
*Significant at the 0.05 probability level.
The mean physiological traits of tetraploid and hexaploid, their correlation with ploidy level and 2C DNA content in E. arundinaceus.
| Traits | Tetraploid mean | Hexaploid mean | Ploidy | 2C DNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose, % | 41.408±0.648 | 38.867±0.222 | -0.394 | -0.275 |
| Hemicellulose, % | 26.539±0.826 | 29.127±0.239 | 0.373 | 0.327 |
| Lignin, % | 12.574±1.059 | 11.311±0.207 | -0.214NS | -0.076NS |
| Ash, % | 5.420±0.511 | 5.415±0.123 | -0.002NS | -0.087NS |
Note:
†Non-significant at the 0.05 probability level,
**Significant at the 0.01 probability level.
ANOVA analysis for comparing ploidy level (tetraploid and hexaploid), accessions of tetraploid, and accessions of hexaploid based on agronomic, physiological traits and DNA content, respectively.
| Traits | Plant height cm | Stem diameter cm | Leaf length cm | Leaf width cm | Tiller number | Water rate % | Cellulose% | Hemicellulose % | Lignin % | Ash % | DNA content % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | 11.17 | 16.43 | 2.92NS | 10.05 | 1.84NS | 0.37NS | 9.73 | 8.59 | 2.55NS | 0.00NS | 167.04 |
| Accessions (tetraploid) | 160.86 | 49.03 | 22.33 | 50.77 | 32.18 | 2.34NS | 6.54 | 12.56 | 40.86 | 10.88 | 0.59NS |
| Accessions (hexaploid) | 17.39 | 13.86 | 10.46 | 26.16 | 46.76 | 4.82NS | 3.22 | 1.87 | 10.31 | 17.69 | 6.74 |
Note:
†Non-significant at the 0.05 probability level;
*Significant at the 0.05 probability level;
**Significant at the 0.01 probability level;
***Significant at the 0.001 probability level;
****Significant at the 0.0001 probability level.