Jacob K Dey1, Lisa E Ishii1, Andrew W Joseph1, Jennifer Goines2, Patrick J Byrne1, Kofi D O Boahene1, Masaru Ishii3. 1. Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The impact of facial defects on quality of life as perceived by society and the value society places on facial reconstruction are important outcomes measures. OBJECTIVE: To measure the health state utility and dollar value of surgically reconstructing facial defects as perceived by society. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized observational study conducted in an academic tertiary referral center using a socioeconomically diverse group of 200 casual observers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Observers viewed images of faces with defects of varying sizes and locations before and after surgical reconstruction. Observers imagined if the defect in each image were on their own face and rated (1) their health state utility with the defect and (2) how much they would be willing to pay to have the defect surgically repaired to normal (perfect repair). Established health state utility and contingent valuation metrics were used. RESULTS: Data from 200 observers were analyzed. Facial defects significantly decreased perceived health state utility with the greatest penalty attributed to large and centrally located defects. Surgical reconstruction of the facial defects increased health state utility to near-normal ranges for all groups except large central defects. Participants were willing to pay an average of $1170 (95% CI, $767-$1572) to repair a de novo small peripheral defect; they were willing to pay $4274 more than the average (95% CI, $3296-$5251) to repair a large defect and $2372 more (95% CI, $1379-$3366) to repair a central defect. Using these valuation and health utility data, we calculated willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life-year (WTP/QALY), a value-related metric. Mean WTP/QALY ratios ranged from $639/QALY for repairing small peripheral defects to $2838/QALY for repairing large central defects, well below all cost-effectiveness thresholds. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Casual observers perceived that facial defects significantly decrease quality of life, an effect improved by reconstructive surgery. Measuring WTP and calculating WTP/QALY provides novel data to assess the social importance and value of facial reconstructive surgery. To our knowledge, these are the first data demonstrating that surgical reconstruction of facial defects is a high-value intervention as perceived by society. These findings have implications for a broad range of stakeholders, including patients, surgeons, health policy makers, and payers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: The impact of facial defects on quality of life as perceived by society and the value society places on facial reconstruction are important outcomes measures. OBJECTIVE: To measure the health state utility and dollar value of surgically reconstructing facial defects as perceived by society. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized observational study conducted in an academic tertiary referral center using a socioeconomically diverse group of 200 casual observers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Observers viewed images of faces with defects of varying sizes and locations before and after surgical reconstruction. Observers imagined if the defect in each image were on their own face and rated (1) their health state utility with the defect and (2) how much they would be willing to pay to have the defect surgically repaired to normal (perfect repair). Established health state utility and contingent valuation metrics were used. RESULTS: Data from 200 observers were analyzed. Facial defects significantly decreased perceived health state utility with the greatest penalty attributed to large and centrally located defects. Surgical reconstruction of the facial defects increased health state utility to near-normal ranges for all groups except large central defects. Participants were willing to pay an average of $1170 (95% CI, $767-$1572) to repair a de novo small peripheral defect; they were willing to pay $4274 more than the average (95% CI, $3296-$5251) to repair a large defect and $2372 more (95% CI, $1379-$3366) to repair a central defect. Using these valuation and health utility data, we calculated willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life-year (WTP/QALY), a value-related metric. Mean WTP/QALY ratios ranged from $639/QALY for repairing small peripheral defects to $2838/QALY for repairing large central defects, well below all cost-effectiveness thresholds. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Casual observers perceived that facial defects significantly decrease quality of life, an effect improved by reconstructive surgery. Measuring WTP and calculating WTP/QALY provides novel data to assess the social importance and value of facial reconstructive surgery. To our knowledge, these are the first data demonstrating that surgical reconstruction of facial defects is a high-value intervention as perceived by society. These findings have implications for a broad range of stakeholders, including patients, surgeons, health policy makers, and payers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Authors: David Chen; Masaru Ishii; Jason Nellis; Kristin Bater; Halley Darrach; David Liao; Andrew Joseph; Patrick Byrne; Kofi Boahene; Ira Papel; Theda Kontis; Lisa E Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Peiyi Su; Lisa E Ishii; Andrew Joseph; Jason Nellis; Jacob Dey; Kristin Bater; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Masaru Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Jacob K Dey; Lisa E Ishii; Jason C Nellis; Kofi D O Boahene; Patrick J Byrne; Masaru Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Jacob K Dey; Lisa E Ishii; Kofi D O Boahene; Patrick J Byrne; Masaru Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.611