Literature DB >> 27010461

Correction: Better Fitness in Captive Cuvier's Gazelle despite Inbreeding Increase: Evidence of Purging?

Eulalia Moreno, Javier Pérez-González, Juan Carranza, Jordi Moya-Laraño.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27010461      PMCID: PMC4806906          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


× No keyword cloud information.
Fig 3 appears incorrectly in the published article. Please see the correct Fig 3 and its legend here.
Fig 3

Evolution of juvenile survival through time.

Relationship between inbreeding and juvenile survival through time. Juvenile survival is a dichotomous variable in which 0 indicates dead individuals and 1 indicates surviving individuals. Figure shows predicted values and 95% confidence bands. Time progresses from left to right, so the left graph shows the relationship between inbreeding and juvenile survival centred in year 1981, while the right graph shows this relationship centred in year 2006 when a major change in pairing management occurred. Graphs were produced with library “effects” [68], which uses the estimates of the effects from GLMMs to predict the values across the entire expand of the explanatory variables. Confidence bands are calculated from standard errors estimated at each of three levels of inbreeding (0.0625, 0.2451 and 0.4277) within each of the time periods.

Evolution of juvenile survival through time.

Relationship between inbreeding and juvenile survival through time. Juvenile survival is a dichotomous variable in which 0 indicates dead individuals and 1 indicates surviving individuals. Figure shows predicted values and 95% confidence bands. Time progresses from left to right, so the left graph shows the relationship between inbreeding and juvenile survival centred in year 1981, while the right graph shows this relationship centred in year 2006 when a major change in pairing management occurred. Graphs were produced with library “effects” [68], which uses the estimates of the effects from GLMMs to predict the values across the entire expand of the explanatory variables. Confidence bands are calculated from standard errors estimated at each of three levels of inbreeding (0.0625, 0.2451 and 0.4277) within each of the time periods.
  1 in total

1.  Better Fitness in Captive Cuvier's Gazelle despite Inbreeding Increase: Evidence of Purging?

Authors:  Eulalia Moreno; Javier Pérez-González; Juan Carranza; Jordi Moya-Laraño
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.