Literature DB >> 27009691

The Genetic Paradox of Invasions revisited: the potential role of inbreeding × environment interactions in invasion success.

Karin Schrieber1, Susanne Lachmuth1,2.   

Abstract

Invasive species that successfully establish, persist, and expand within an area of introduction, in spite of demographic bottlenecks that reduce their genetic diversity, represent a paradox. Bottlenecks should inhibit population growth and invasive expansion, as a decrease in genetic diversity should result in inbreeding depression, increased fixation of deleterious mutations by genetic drift (drift load), and reduced evolutionary potential to respond to novel selection pressures. Here, we focus on the problems of inbreeding depression and drift load in introduced populations as key components of the Genetic Paradox of Invasions (GPI). We briefly review published explanations for the GPI, which are based on various mechanisms (invasion history events, reproductive traits, genetic characteristics) that mediate the avoidance of inbreeding depression and drift load. We find that there is still a substantial lack of explanation and empirical evidence for explaining the GPI for strongly bottlenecked invasions, or for during critical invasion phases (e.g. initial colonization, leading edges of range expansion) where strong genetic depletion, inbreeding depression and drift load occurs. Accordingly, we suggest that discussion of the GPI should be revived to find additional mechanisms applicable to explaining invasion success for such species and invasion phases. Based on a synthesis of the literature on the population genetics of invaders and the ecology of invaded habitats, we propose that inbreeding × environment (I × E) interactions are one such mechanism that may have strong explanatory power to address the GPI. Specifically, we suggest that a temporary or permanent release from stress in invaded habitats may alleviate the negative effects of genetic depletion on fitness via I × E interactions, and present published empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis. We additionally discuss that I × E interactions can result in rapid evolutionary changes, and may even contribute to adaptation of invaders in the absence of high genetic variation. With a view to encouraging further empirical research, we propose an experimental approach to investigate the occurrence of I × E interactions in ongoing invasions. Revived research on the GPI should provide new fundamental insights into eco-evolutionary invasion biology, and more generally into the evolutionary consequences of the interactions between inbreeding and environment.
© 2016 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological invasion; contemporary evolution; environmental stress; genetic diversity; genetic drift; genetic load; herbivory; inbreeding depression; purging; stress response

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27009691     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  23 in total

1.  Trait divergence, not plasticity, determines the success of a newly invasive plant.

Authors:  Gina L Marchini; Caitlin A Maraist; Mitchell B Cruzan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Robert I Colautti; Jake M Alexander; Katrina M Dlugosch; Stephen R Keller; Sonia E Sultan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Gridlock and beltways: the genetic context of urban invasions.

Authors:  E M X Reed; M E Serr; A S Maurer; M O Burford Reiskind
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Beyond propagule pressure: importance of selection during the transport stage of biological invasions.

Authors:  Elizabeta Briski; Farrah T Chan; John A Darling; Velda Lauringson; Hugh J MacIsaac; Aibin Zhan; Sarah A Bailey
Journal:  Front Ecol Environ       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 11.123

5.  Cancer Ecology and Evolution: Positive interactions and system vulnerability.

Authors:  Frederick R Adler; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-09-11

6.  Transcriptomic Profiling Provides Insights into Inbreeding Depression in Yesso Scallop Patinopecten yessoensis.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Yangping Li; Jiarun Lou; Zhihui Yang; Huan Liao; Qiang Fu; Zhenyi Guo; Shanshan Lian; Xiaoli Hu; Zhemin Bao
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  The Role of Genetic Factors in the Differential Invasion Success of Two Spartina Species in China.

Authors:  Feifei Li; Xiaoyan Liu; Jinfang Zhu; Junsheng Li; Kexiao Gao; Caiyun Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Going with the flow: analysis of population structure reveals high gene flow shaping invasion pattern and inducing range expansion of Mikania micrantha in Asia.

Authors:  Achyut Kumar Banerjee; Zhuangwei Hou; Yuting Lin; Wentao Lan; Fengxiao Tan; Fen Xing; Guanghe Li; Wuxia Guo; Yelin Huang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  The evolutionary dynamics of biological invasions: A multi-approach perspective.

Authors:  Stéphanie Sherpa; Laurence Després
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 10.  An ecological and evolutionary perspective on the parallel invasion of two cross-compatible trees.

Authors:  Guillaume Besnard; Peter Cuneo
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.