Literature DB >> 27009686

Depth Perception of Surgeons in Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Rositsa Bogdanova1, Pierre Boulanger1, Bin Zheng2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) poses visual challenges to the surgeons. In MIS, binocular disparity is not freely available for surgeons, who are required to mentally rebuild the 3-dimensional (3D) patient anatomy from a limited number of monoscopic visual cues. The insufficient depth cues from the MIS environment could cause surgeons to misjudge spatial depth, which could lead to performance errors thus jeopardizing patient safety. In this article, we will first discuss the natural human depth perception by exploring the main depth cues available for surgeons in open procedures. Subsequently, we will reveal what depth cues are lost in MIS and how surgeons compensate for the incomplete depth presentation. Next, we will further expand our knowledge by exploring some of the available solutions for improving depth presentation to surgeons. Here we will review the innovative approaches (multiple 2D camera assembly, shadow introduction) and devices (3D monitors, head-mounted devices, and auto-stereoscopic monitors) for 3D image presentation from the past few years.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ergonomics; human factors study; image-guided surgery; simulation; surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27009686     DOI: 10.1177/1553350616639141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  7 in total

1.  Construct and face validity of the educational computer-based environment (ECE) assessment scenarios for basic endoneurosurgery skills.

Authors:  Nergiz Ercil Cagiltay; Erol Ozcelik; Gokhan Sengul; Mustafa Berker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A variable baseline stereoscopic camera with fast deployable structure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Xinan Sun; He Su; Jinhua Li; Shuxin Wang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Motion and viewing analysis during minimally invasive surgery for autostereoscopic visualization.

Authors:  Viktor Vörös; Ann-Sophie Page; Jan Deprest; Tom Kimpe; Emmanuel Vander Poorten
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tibor A Zwimpfer; Claudine Wismer; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; James Geiger; Andreas Schötzau; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

5.  Assessment of 3-Dimensional vs 2-Dimensional Imaging and Technical Performance Using a Multiport Intraoperative Data Capture and Analytic System for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Mauricio E Gabrielli; Tomas J Saun; James J Jung; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03

6.  Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Abdul Razaque Shaikh; Aijaz Ahmed Shaikh; Mujib Abbasi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Development of a Robotic Surgery Training System.

Authors:  Robin Julia Trute; Carlos Suárez Zapico; Andreas Christou; Daniel Layeghi; Stewart Craig; Mustafa Suphi Erden
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.