Literature DB >> 27009219

Genetic variation in aggregation behaviour and interacting phenotypes in Drosophila.

Anne-Sophie Philippe1, Raphael Jeanson2, Cristian Pasquaretta3, Francois Rebaudo4, Cedric Sueur3, Frederic Mery5.   

Abstract

Aggregation behaviour is the tendency for animals to group together, which may have important consequences on individual fitness. We used a combination of experimental and simulation approaches to study how genetic variation and social environment interact to influence aggregation dynamics in Drosophila To do this, we used two different natural lines of Drosophila that arise from a polymorphism in the foraging gene (rovers and sitters). We placed groups of flies in a heated arena. Flies could freely move towards one of two small, cooler refuge areas. In groups of the same strain, sitters had a greater tendency to aggregate. The observed behavioural variation was based on only two parameters: the probability of entering a refuge and the likelihood of choosing a refuge based on the number of individuals present. We then directly addressed how different strains interact by mixing rovers and sitters within a group. Aggregation behaviour of each line was strongly affected by the presence of the other strain, without changing the decision rules used by each. Individuals obeying local rules shaped complex group dynamics via a constant feedback loop between the individual and the group. This study could help to identify the circumstances under which particular group compositions may improve individual fitness through underlying aggregation mechanisms under specific environmental conditions.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; aggregation behaviour; foraging gene; interacting phenotypes; social interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27009219      PMCID: PMC4822458          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  29 in total

1.  Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Christos C Ioannou; Güven Demirel; Thilo Gross; Colin J Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Larissa Conradt; Simon A Levin; Naomi E Leonard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Waking experience affects sleep need in Drosophila.

Authors:  Indrani Ganguly-Fitzgerald; Jeff Donlea; Paul J Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  On indirect genetic effects in structured populations.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; E D Brodie; M J Wade
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Task-specific expression of the foraging gene in harvester ants.

Authors:  Krista K Ingram; Peter Oefner; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  The foraging gene, behavioral plasticity, and honeybee division of labor.

Authors:  Y Ben-Shahar
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard.

Authors:  J Cote; J Clobert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans.

Authors:  M de Bono; C I Bargmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila.

Authors:  K A Osborne; A Robichon; E Burgess; S Butland; R A Shaw; A Coulthard; H S Pereira; R J Greenspan; M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mutations in the larval foraging gene affect adult locomotory behavior after feeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  H S Pereira; M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Viral infection causes sex-specific changes in fruit fly social aggregation behaviour.

Authors:  Jonathon A Siva-Jothy; Pedro F Vale
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The Drosophila foraging gene human orthologue PRKG1 predicts individual differences in the effects of early adversity on maternal sensitivity.

Authors:  H Moriah Sokolowski; Oscar E Vasquez; Eva Unternaehrer; Dustin J Sokolowski; Stephanie D Biergans; Leslie Atkinson; Andrea Gonzalez; Patricia P Silveira; Robert Levitan; Kieran J O'Donnell; Meir Steiner; James Kennedy; Michael J Meaney; Alison S Fleming; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2016-12-28

3.  Transition between segregation and aggregation: the role of environmental constraints.

Authors:  Stamatios C Nicolis; José Halloy; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences.

Authors:  Michel-Olivier Laurent Salazar; Stamatios C Nicolis; Mariano Calvo Martín; Grégory Sempo; Jean-Louis Deneubourg; Isaac Planas-Sitjà
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  An interaction-driven cannibalistic reaction norm.

Authors:  Kinya Nishimura
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Social intolerance is a consequence, not a cause, of dispersal in spiders.

Authors:  Violette Chiara; Felipe Ramon Portugal; Raphael Jeanson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Collective action or individual choice: Spontaneity and individuality contribute to decision-making in Drosophila.

Authors:  Isabelle Steymans; Luciana M Pujol-Lereis; Björn Brembs; E Axel Gorostiza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Consensus driven by a minority in heterogenous groups of the cockroach Periplaneta american a.

Authors:  Mariano Calvo Martín; Max Eeckhout; Jean-Louis Deneubourg; Stamatios C Nicolis
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-12

9.  The foraging gene affects alcohol sensitivity, metabolism and memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Anne S Oepen; Jamie L Catalano; Reza Azanchi; Karla R Kaun
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 1.696

10.  Quantitative genetics of the use of conspecific and heterospecific social cues for breeding site choice.

Authors:  Jere Tolvanen; Sami M Kivelä; Blandine Doligez; Jennifer Morinay; Lars Gustafsson; Piter Bijma; Veli-Matti Pakanen; Jukka T Forsman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.171

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.