Literature DB >> 27009156

Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in the electromyographic activity of upper extremity muscles during reach-to-grasp.

Adam G Rouse1, Marc H Schieber2.   

Abstract

In reaching to grasp an object, proximal muscles that act on the shoulder and elbow classically have been viewed as transporting the hand to the intended location, while distal muscles that act on the fingers simultaneously shape the hand to grasp the object. Prior studies of electromyographic (EMG) activity in upper extremity muscles therefore have focused, by and large, either on proximal muscle activity during reaching to different locations or on distal muscle activity as the subject grasps various objects. Here, we examined the EMG activity of muscles from the shoulder to the hand, as monkeys reached and grasped in a task that dissociated location and object. We quantified the extent to which variation in the EMG activity of each muscle depended on location, on object, and on their interaction-all as a function of time. Although EMG variation depended on both location and object beginning early in the movement, an early phase of substantial location effects in muscles from proximal to distal was followed by a later phase in which object effects predominated throughout the extremity. Interaction effects remained relatively small. Our findings indicate that neural control of reach-to-grasp may occur largely in two sequential phases: the first, serving to project the entire upper extremity toward the intended location, and the second, acting predominantly to shape the entire extremity for grasping the object.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  EMG; arm; electromyography; hand; manipulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27009156      PMCID: PMC4946606          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00008.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Consistent features in the forelimb representation of primary motor cortex in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  M C Park; A Belhaj-Saïf; M Gordon; P D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; M Elise Johanson; Joseph D Towles
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Vassilis Raos; Maria-Alessandra Umiltá; Akira Murata; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Coordinate system representations of movement direction in the premotor cortex.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Encoding of reach and grasp by single neurons in premotor cortex is independent of recording site.

Authors:  Eran Stark; Itay Asher; Moshe Abeles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  An integrative approach to the biomechanical function and neuromuscular control of the fingers.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Decoding the activity of grasping neurons recorded from the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  J Carpaneto; M A Umiltà; L Fogassi; A Murata; V Gallese; S Micera; V Raos
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A common structure underlies low-frequency cortical dynamics in movement, sleep, and sedation.

Authors:  Thomas M Hall; Felipe de Carvalho; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal Distribution of Location and Object Effects in Primary Motor Cortex Neurons during Reach-to-Grasp.

Authors:  Adam G Rouse; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Low-frequency stimulation enhances ensemble co-firing and dexterity after stroke.

Authors:  Preeya Khanna; Douglas Totten; Lisa Novik; Jeffrey Roberts; Robert J Morecraft; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Deciphering the functional role of spatial and temporal muscle synergies in whole-body movements.

Authors:  Ioannis Delis; Pauline M Hilt; Thierry Pozzo; Stefano Panzeri; Bastien Berret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Behavioral Context Determines Network State and Variability Dynamics in Monkey Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Alexa Riehle; Thomas Brochier; Martin Nawrot; Sonja Grün
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Condition-Dependent Neural Dimensions Progressively Shift during Reach to Grasp.

Authors:  Adam G Rouse; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 9.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.