Literature DB >> 27008297

Effect of 3 Different Doses of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine (2.5µg, 5µg, and 10 µg) on Subarachnoid Block Characteristics: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Dose-Response Trial.

Mayank Gupta, Priyanka Gupta1, Dhananjay Kumar Singh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extended analgesic efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (ITD) has been investigated in a few clinical trials; however, there is a lack of conclusive evidence upon its ideal dosage.
OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the dose-response relationship between ITD and subarachnoid block characteristics, particularly the duration of analgesia and differential analgesia (DA: defined as time difference from the offset of motor blockade to the first analgesic requirement on numerical rating scale = 4.0). STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized double blind active control trial.
SETTING: Medical college teaching hospital.
METHODS: Ninety adult (18 - 60 years) patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were randomized into 3 groups to receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine 3 mL with 2.5 µg (group BD2.5), 5µg (group BD5), or 10 µg (group BD10) dexmedetomidine in 0.5 mL normal saline. The 2 segment sensory regression times (TSSRT), duration of motor blockade analgesia, DA, and perioperative adverse effects were assessed. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia and DA. STATISTICS: ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test, Chi-square (x2), and Fisher's exact test, significance: P < 0.05.
RESULTS: The onset of sensory block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with group BD5 (P = 0.035) and BD2.5 (P = 0.010) while the onset of motor block was significantly earlier in group BD10 compared with BD2.5 (P = 0.020). There was a significant and dose-dependent prolongation of the duration of sensory block (127.50, 149.17, and 187.50 minutes; P < 0.001), motor block (258.50, 331, and 365 minutes; P < 0.001), analgesia (306.17, 396.50, and 512 minutes; P < 0.001), and DA (47.67, 65.50, and147 minutes; P < 0.001) with escalating doses of ITD, respectively. Group BD10 required significantly fewer rescue analgesics compared with other 2 groups (P = 0.001). Except for mild sedation which was significantly higher in group BD10; all the groups were comparable with respect to hemodynamic and other adverse effects. LIMITATIONS: Lack of placebo group, exclusion of higher doses (15µg) of ITD, and short duration of postoperative follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 10 µg compared with 2.5 µg or 5µg ITD to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine is associated with significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block, motor block, analgesia, and DA with a comparable adverse effect profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27008297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  10 in total

1.  Dexmedetomidine as a neuraxial adjuvant for prevention of perioperative shivering: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Xuena Zhang; Hui Wang; Haibin Zhou; Tian Tian; Anshi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparative addition of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic procedure in lower limbs.

Authors:  Poupak Rahimzadeh; Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz; Farnad Imani; Pooya Derakhshan; Saeed Amniati
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Effect of different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics after ropivacaine spinal anesthesia in lower-limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Laleh Farokhmehr; Hesameddin Modir; Bijan Yazdi; Alireza Kamali; Amir Almasi-Hashiani
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

4.  Intrathecal dexmedetomidine can decrease the 95% effective dose of bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized study.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Jing Qian; Bei Shen; Fei Xiao; Huaxiang Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Intrathecal dexmedetomidine improves epidural labor analgesia effects: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gehui Li; Hao Wang; Xiaofei Qi; Xiaolei Huang; Yuantao Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  The Effect of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on the Properties of Subarachnoid Blockade: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad K Al Nobani; Mohammed A Ayasa; Tarek A Tageldin; Abduljabbar Alhammoud; Marcus Daniel Lance
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Combined With Ropivacaine in Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Ling-Yi Xia; Wei-Dong Liang; Ding-Yu Rao; Ping-Ping Zhu; Ke-Nv Huang; Zi-Hao Deng; Mao-Lin Zhong
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-07

8.  Addition of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Randomized, Comparative Study.

Authors:  Jitendra V Kalbande; Ketki D Deotale; Archana K N; Habib Md R Karim
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-22

9.  The effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on the dose requirement of hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study.

Authors:  Feng Xia; Xiangyang Chang; Yinfa Zhang; Lizhong Wang; Fei Xiao
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  The efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Li; Yu-Mei Li; Xue-Li Lv; Xing-He Wang; Su Liu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.217

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.